Ellen A. Pansky

Attorney Profile

Top Rated Professional Liability Attorney in South Pasadena, CA

Pansky Markle LLP
 | 1010 Sycamore Avenue, Suite 308
South Pasadena, CA 91030
Phone: 213-626-7300
Selected to Super Lawyers: 2006 - 2018
Licensed Since: 1977
Practice Areas:
  • Professional Liability: Defense (90%),
  • Professional Liability: Plaintiff (10%)
Attorney Profile

A founder of Pansky Markle Attorneys at Law, Ellen A. Pansky focuses her practice on professional liability cases, primarily involving the legal profession. Located in South Pasadena, California, she represents bar applicants and attorneys throughout Los Angeles County and other parts of the state in licensing and regulatory proceedings, and she has also represented both plaintiffs and defendants in legal malpractice cases. Ms. Pansky has been certified as a specialist in legal malpractice law by the Board of Legal Specialization of The State Bar of California, and she has given expert opinion testimony in legal malpractice lawsuits. She frequently delivers presentations on legal ethics and professional responsibility to continuing legal education attendees.

A native of Southern California, Ms. Pansky attended the University of California, Los Angeles, as an undergraduate, and received a Bachelor of Arts summa cum laude in 1974. She then enrolled at Loyola Law School and was awarded her Juris Doctor in 1977. After graduation, Ms. Pansky joined the Office of Chief Trial Counsel of The State Bar of California, where she spent five years as a prosecutor and was involved in many disciplinary proceedings before becoming an assistant general counsel for The State Bar of California. She entered private practice in 1985.

Admitted to practice in California, Ms. Pansky is also admitted to practice before the U.S. District Courts for the Central, Northern and Southern Districts of California and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit. A recipient of The State Bar of California's Wiley W. Manuel Certificate for Pro Bono Legal Services, Ms. Pansky has been given other honors as well, including an AV Preeminent* peer review rating through Martindale-Hubbell.

*AV®, AV Preeminent®, Martindale-Hubbell Distinguished and Martindale-Hubbell Notable are certification marks used under license in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies. Martindale-Hubbell® is the facilitator of a peer review rating process. Ratings reflect the anonymous opinions of members of the bar and the judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Rating™ fall into two categories – legal ability and general ethical standards.

Practice Areas
Lawyer Practice Area Pie Chart

Professional Liability (90%): Legal Malpractice, Professional Malpractice - Other, Ethics & Professional Responsibility

Professional Liability (10%): Legal Malpractice, Professional Malpractice - Other, Ethics & Professional Responsibility

Focus Areas

Professional Liability: Legal Malpractice, Professional Malpractice - Other, Ethics & Professional Responsibility

Professional Liability: Legal Malpractice, Professional Malpractice - Other, Ethics & Professional Responsibility


Selected to Super Lawyers for 13 yearsbottom-image

Super Lawyers: 2006 - 2018

Certificates and Credentials

California Board of Legal Specialization

Email Me

To: Ellen A. Pansky
Super Lawyers: Potential Client Inquiry

About Ellen Pansky

Admitted: 1977, California

Professional Webpage: http://panskymarkle.com/ellen-pansky/

Honors and Awards:

  • Super Lawyers, 2006 - present
  • Wiley W. Manuel Pro Bono Services Award
  • Martindale Hubble Preeminent Lawyer

Special Licenses/Certifications:

  • California State Bar Certified Specialist in the area of Legal Malpractice Law

Bar/Professional Activity:

  • Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
  • United States District Courts for the Southern Districts of California
  • United States District Courts for the Central Districts of California
  • United States District Courts for the Northern Districts of California
  • California, 1977
  • California State Bar’s Pilot Program Interaction Advisory Committee
  • Steering Committee of the BreakfastClub
  • Association of Southern California Defense Counsel
  • Women Lawyers’ Association of Los Angeles
  • National Association of Women Lawyers
  • ABA Standing Committee on Ethics and Professional Responsibility representing APRL, 2006-2008
  • ABA Women Rainmakers Committee
  • American Bar Association
  • Ad Hoc President’s Advisory Committee on Women in the Legal Profession, 2013-2016
  • Ad Hoc Committee on State Bar Admissions Regulation Reform Proposals, 2013-2016
  • Los Angeles County Bar Association Senior Lawyers Division Executive Committee, 2010-2013
  • LACBA-WLALA Joint Task Force on the Retention and Promotion of Women Lawyers, Member 2010-present
  • Los Angeles County Bar Association, Assistant Vice President, 2009-2012
  • Los Angeles County Bar Association, Member of the Board of Trustees, 2005-2009

Pro bono/Community Service:

  • The Fellows of the American Bar Foundation

Scholarly Lectures and Writings:

  • “An Attorney’s Expanding Fiduciary Duties to Opposing Parties and Non-Clients,” State Bar General Practice Section Newsletter, Fall 1992
  • “Client Trust Account Procedures: How to Ensure Proper Compliance,” Los Angeles Lawyer, December 1992
  • California Women Lawyers’ Glass Ceiling Surveys Reports (1993-94 and 1995)
  • “Barred for Life? Permanent Sanction for Ethics Abuses Won’t Cure Profession’s Ills,” Los Angeles Daily Journal, May 1995
  • “Mitigation of Disciplinary Sanctions: Justice and Fairness Require Analysis of Each Individual Attorney,” The Professional Lawyer, American Bar Association 21st Ethics Symposium, June 1995
  • “Gender Bias in the Legal Profession,” Women Lawyers Journal, April 1996
  • “Between an Ethical Rock and a Hard Place: Balancing Duties to the Organizational Client and Its Constituents,” South Texas Law Review, October 1996
  • “Conduct Becoming,” Los Angeles Lawyer, September 1997
  • “When Representing Multiple Parties, Don’t Waver on Waivers,” Los Angeles Daily Journal, September 1999
  • “Balance Client Trust Account to Avoid Bar Discipline,” Los Angeles Daily Journal, June 1999
  • “One Easy Way to Become the Target of a State Bar Complaint: Fail to Regularly Communicate with Clients,” Los Angeles Daily Journal, August 1999
  • “Bonus Points,” Los Angeles Lawyer, September 2000
  • “Fair Share?” Los Angeles Daily Journal (California Law Business Supplement) October 2000
  • “Construction Project: Authorizing Ethical Walls in California” Los Angeles County Bar Update, April 2000, Vol. 20, No. 4
  • “Don’t Fight Your Substitution Out of a Client’s Matter” Los Angeles County Bar Update, January 2002, Vol. 22, No. 1
  •  “Communication and Diligence,” Emory Law Journal, August 2003
  • “Belated Fee Complaints: What to Do?” Los Angeles County Bar publication – Los Angeles County Bar Update January 2004
  • “Lien Provisions in Contingent Fee Contracts: Are You Violating the California Rules of Professional Conduct?” – Forum April 2006
  • “Breaking Up Is Hard To Do: Terminating the Attorney/Client Relationship,” Los Angeles County Bar Update, January 2007, Vol. 27, No.1
  • “California Ethical Rules Governing Restriction on Law Practice” ABA/CPR Conference June 2007
  •  “The Connection Between Ethical Advocacy and a Lawyer’s Integrity” Los Angeles County Bar Update, November 2007
  • “Application of California’s Modified Substantial Relationship Test to International Law Firm Conflict of Interest: Creative Solution or Can of Worms?” Penn State Law Review, October 2008
  • “To Err Is Human – Or Is It Moral Turpitude?” Los Angeles County Bar Update, Vol. 29, No. 3, March 2009
  • “Wearing Many Hats” State Bar of California Big Meeting Magazine, 2009 Annual Meeting IssueFall 2009
  • “A Flat Fee Future” Los Angeles County Bar Update, January 2010
  • “Playing the Percentages”Los Angeles County Bar Update, Vol. 30, No. 9, October 2010
  • “Attorney Discipline: Are We on the Wrong Path?” Los Angeles Lawyer, July/August 2012
  • “Can We Talk? What and When to Tell Your Client About Your Potential Legal Malpractice.” Best Practices for Addressing Professional Liability Claims
  • “You’re Outta Here! Avoiding Disqualification When Representing Small Organizational Clients” LACBA Update November/December, 2015

Verdicts and Settlements:

  • In Re Paguirigan (2001) 25 Cal.4th 1, and In Re Lesansky (2001) 25 Cal.4th 11
  • Lybbert v. State Bar (Review Dept. 1993) 2 Cal. State Bar Ct. Rptr. 297
  • Sternlieb v. State Bar (1990) 52 Cal.3d 317
  • Lister v. State Bar (1990) 51 Cal.3d 1117
  • Trousil v. State Bar (1985) 38 Cal.3d 337
  • Ritter v. State Bar (1985) 40 Cal.3d 595
  • Leoni v. State Bar (1985) 39 Cal.3d 609
  • Tarver v. State Bar (1984) 37 Cal. 3d 122
  • Palomo v. State Bar (1984) 36 Cal.3d 785
  • Greene v. Zank (1984) 158 Cal.App.3d 497
  • Ballard v. State Bar (1983) 35 Cal.3d. In 1983
  • Rimel v. State Bar (1983) 34 Cal. 3d 128

Educational Background:

  • B.A. from the University of California at Los Angeles in 1974

Industry Groups

  • Association Of Professional Responsibility Lawyers; American Bar Association; Los Angeles County Bar
Find Me Online
Office Location for Ellen A. Pansky

1010 Sycamore Avenue
Suite 308
South Pasadena, CA 91030

Phone: 213-626-7300


Ellen A. Pansky:

Last Updated: 2/9/2018

Page Generated: 0.6448700428009 sec