Top Rated Class Action & Mass Torts Attorney in Sacramento, CA

Brooks Cutter is the founding partner of the premier Sacramento, California-based civil justice law firm, Cutter Law P.C. His practice consists of serious personal injury cases, including: consumer class actions, defective medical devices, dangerous drugs, medical malpractice, insurance bad faith cases, whistleblower/qui tam lawsuits, auto accidents, consumer fraud, product liability, elder abuse, medical malpractice.

Rated AV-Preeminent by Martindale-Hubbell,* Brooks is considered by his peers to be at the highest level of his profession. Brooks obtained a $7.6 million jury verdict for his client who had suffered a spinal cord injury after her doctors failed to diagnose a tumor on her spine. The award was the largest in Sacramento County's history. Additionally, Brooks has successfully represented individuals in multiple whistleblower lawsuits, including reaching a settlement for $23.5 million on behalf of four whistleblowers. The case involved government fraud claims against one of the world's largest medical device manufacturers.

A skilled consumer class-action lawyer with a proven track record, Brooks Cutter has represented thousands of individuals across the country ranging from Ford Motor Credit customers, to California Allstate customers, to over 200 Americans injured from a defective medical device.

Brooks graduated from Stanford University School of Law in 1985, where he was editor-in-chief of the "Stanford Journal of International Law." He was a law clerk to Chief Judge James R. Browning of the United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit from 1985 to 1986. Prior to entering law school, he earned a bachelor of arts degree with distinction from the University of California at Berkeley and a master of philosophy degree from Cambridge University in England.

^{*AV-Preeminent and BV-Distinguished are certification marks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies. Martindale-Hubbell is the facilitator of a peer review rating process. Ratings reflect the confidential opinions of members of the Bar and the judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell ratings fall into two categories – legal ability and general ethical standards.}