Steven N. Williams
Top rated antitrust litigation attorney in San Francisco, California
Joseph Saveri Law Firm, LLP
Practice Areas: Antitrust litigation, Consumer law, Securities litigation; view more
Licensed in California since: 1994
Education: Fordham University School of Law
Call today:
415-500-6800
Joseph Saveri Law Firm, LLP
601 California St.Suite 1000
San Francisco, CA 94108 Visit website
Details
In over twenty-five years of practice Steven N. Williams has handled successfully and with distinction all aspects of litigation and trial in state and federal courts and in private arbitration.
Mr. Williams has played a lead role in many of the most prominent antitrust class cases litigated in the United States over the last decade, including In re Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation, In re Static Random Access Memory Litigation, Precision Associates v. Panalpina World Transport, and In re Transpacific Air Transportation Litigation. He has helped recover more than $2 billion and has been responsible for new law including ground-breaking decisions narrowing the scope of the Filed Rate Doctrine and permitting civil damage claims in E. & J. Gallo Winery v. EnCana Corp., 503 F.3d 1027 (2007) and Wortman v. All Nippon Airways, 854 F.3d 606 (2017), and a ruling that “umbrella damages” are available under California state law. County of San Mateo v. CSL, Ltd., 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116342 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 20, 2014). He represents a plaintiff class of content moderators against Facebook, Inc., alleging that Facebook failed to protect the class from developing post-traumatic stress disorder and other adverse effects resulting from constant viewing of offensive and extremely disturbing videos, images, and broadcasts posted to Facebook. This "first of its kind" lawsuit resulted in reaching a settlement of $52 million and workplace improvements with Facebook.
Mr. Williams, previously a long-time partner at Cotchett, Pitre & McCarthy, LLP, practices in the fields of litigation, trial, and client counseling, with an emphasis on representation of civil plaintiffs in antitrust matters. He has served in leadership positions in more than a dozen antitrust class cases throughout the United States. During his career, he has represented claimants in cases involving memory chips, pharmaceuticals, air passenger transportation, air cargo transportation, cathode ray tubes, capacitors, resistors, flash memory, lithium-ion batteries, financial products and services, poultry, and water. He has been appointed to represent classes, and in non-class cases he has represented the Chief Justice of California, the Judicial Council of California, Consumers Union of United States, Inc., the United Farm Workers, Dolores Huerta, public pension funds, private investment funds, many cities and counties of California, public utilities including water districts, and individual consumers.
Mr. Williams has written and lectured on various topics including antitrust, multidistrict litigation, complex litigation, electronic discovery, MTBE litigation, regulatory developments in environmental law, contractual issues in environmental cleanups, and habeas corpus. He has spoken at many venues, including the American Bar Association Antitrust Section Spring Meeting, the California State Bar Antitrust, UCL and Privacy Section, the New York State Bar Association Antitrust Section, and the Consumer Attorneys of California. He is the author or co-author of many legal publications.
Mr. Williams was appointed by the Consumer Attorneys of California (CAOC) as a member of the California Discovery Subcommittee for revision of California discovery rules and statutes relating to electronic discovery and electronically stored information, 2007-2008. He has given yearly presentations to CAOC on topics of civil discovery in California. He is currently in leadership with the American Bar Association Antitrust Section and is a member of the International Cartel Task Force and the Executive Committee of the Committee to Support the Antitrust Laws. He is an advisor to the Executive Committee of the California Lawyers Association Section on Antitrust, Unfair Competition Law, and Privacy Law, and was chair of the 2017 Golden State Antitrust Institute. He is a Board Member of Public Justice and past Chairman of the Board of Community Gatepath, an organization dedicated to serving the needs of developmentally disabled children and adults. He received the Justice & Diversity Center (JDC) of the Bar Association of San Francisco’s Federal Pro Bono Project 2020 Crystal Award for “Outstanding Volunteer of the Year.” In 2021, Super Lawyers profiled his and the firm's pro bono success and Chambers and Partners shortlisted the firm's pro bono efforts in its Diversity & Inclusion Awards.
Mr. Williams received his J.D. from the Fordham University School of Law and his B.A. in Russian and Slavic Studies from New York University.
Practice areas
Antitrust litigation, Consumer law, Securities litigationFocus areas
Antitrust & trade litigation, Consumer protection
- 60% Antitrust litigation
- 20% Consumer law
- 20% Securities litigation
First Admitted: 1992, New Jersey
Professional Webpage: https://saverilawfirm.com/attorneys/steven-n-williams/
- Working with Northern District of California’s Federal Pro Bono Project, which operates in conjunction with the Bar Association of San Francisco’s Justice and Diversity Center
- Community Gatepath, Past Chairman of the Board
- Public Justice, Board Member
- Representing Direct Purchaser Plaintiffs (of capacitors), In re Capacitors Antitrust Litigation, No. 3:14-cv-03264-JD (N.D. Cal.)
- Representing a potential class of content moderators against Facebook, Scola et al. v. Facebook, Inc., 18CIV05135 (San Mateo County Sup. Ct.)
- Representing consumers and insurers in class action lawsuits filed against dozens of generic drug manufacturers who are accused of fixing the prices of dozens of different generic drugs, In re Generic Pharmaceuticals Pricing Antitrust Litigation, No. 2:16-md-02724-CMR (E.D. Pa.)
- Representing a proposed Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs Class of individuals and companies who purchased interior molded doors, In re: Interior Molded Doors Indirect Purchaser Antitrust Litigation, Lead Civil Action No. 3:18-cv-00850 (E.D. Va.)
- Representing direct purchaser (of e-cigarette devices) plaintiffs, In re Juul Labs, Inc. Antitrust Litigation, No. 3:20-cv-02345-WHO (N.D. Cal.)
- Representing a potential class of content moderators against YouTube, Inc., Jane Doe v. YouTube, Inc., No. 20-CIV-04023 (San Mateo County Sup. Ct.)
- Representing drug purchasers in consolidated class action suit against Defendants Mylan N.V. et al. in In re EpiPen: Marketing, Sales Practices and Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 2785, No. 17-md-2785-DDC-TJJ (D. Kan.)
- "U.S. DOJ Gives Important New Guidance for Antitrust Leniency," California Daily Journal (2022)
- "A Practitioner's Perspective: Why the Supreme Court Should Not Overturn Illinois Brick in Apple v. Pepper," Competition, The Journal of the Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law Section of the California Lawyers Association, 2019
- “Should United States Courts Defer to Foreign Governments?,” Chambers and Partners’s Cartels 2019 global practice guide
- “‘Apple v. Pepper’ Will Enhance Private Antitrust Enforcement by Confirming Bright-Line Rule of ‘Illinois Brick,' the Recorder, May 15, 2019
- “‘Pepper’ as a Back Door to ‘Illinois Brick’ (and ‘ARC America’)?” and “Should ‘Hanover Shoe’ and ‘Illinois Brick’ Be Discarded?,” August 2018 The Recorder
- Deciphering the FTAIA, 2014
- 46th Annual CAOC Convention, 2012
- Recoveries for Violations of Federal and California Antitrust Statutes Should Not Be Apportioned, Competition, Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law Section, California State Bar, 2014
- Federal and State Class Antitrust Actions Should Not Be Tried in a Single Trial, The Journal of the Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law Section of the State Bar of California, 2014
- Antitrust Law Developments (Eighth), American Bar Association
- Antitrust Whistleblowers Get Clarity, Los Angeles and San Francisco Daily Journal, 2013
- Courts Rein in the Cost of E-Discovery When Lawyers and Their Clients Won’t,” California Lawyer, April 2012
- California’s 2009 E-Discovery Laws, Text and Analysis, LexisNexis 2009
- Scola v. Facebook, Inc., No. 18CIV05135 (San Mateo Sup. Ct.) ($52 settlement plus workplace safety improvements)
- In re Capacitors Antitrust Litigation, No. 3:14-cv-03264-JD (N.D. Cal.) ($604.55 million in settlements to date)
- In re Interior Molded Doors Indiret Purchaser Antitrust Litigation, No. 3:18-cv-00850 (E.D. Va.) ($19.5 million settlement)
- Jane Doe v. YouTube, Inc., No. 20-CV-07493-YGR (N.D. Cal.) ($4.3 million preliminary settlement)
- In re EpiPen: Marketing, Sales Practices and Antitrust Litigation, MDL No. 2785, No. 17-md-2785-DDC-TJJ (D. Kan.) ($345 millioin and $264 million settlements)
- In re Transpacific Air Transportation Antitrust Litig., MDL No. 1913, No. 07-5634 CRB (N.D. Cal.) ($85 million settlement)
- In re Automotive Parts Antitrust Litig., MDL No. 2311, No. 12-md-2311 MOB (E.D. Mich.) ($1.25 billion settlement)
- In re Static Random Access Memory Litigation, MDL No. 1819, No. 07-1819 (N.D. Cal.) ($77 million settlement)
- Wortman v. All Nippon Airways, 854 F.3d 606 (9th Cir. 2017) (affirmed and remanded district court's partial denial of Defendants' motion for summary judgment)
- Precision Associates v. Panalpina World Exports (Holding) Co. (“Freight Forwarders Antitrust Litigation”), No. 08-cv-0042 JJG-VVP (E.D.N.Y.) ($385 million settlement)
- County of San Mateo v. CSL, Ltd., 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 116342 (N.D. Cal.) (motion for partial summary judgment denied)
- E. & J. Gallo Winery v. EnCana Corp., 503 F.3d 1027 (9th Cir. 2007) (affirming district court's denial of EnCana's summary judgment motion)
- American Antitrust Institute: selected as an Honoree for AAI's 2019 Antitrust Enforcement Awards for Outstanding Antitrust Litigation Achievement in Private Law Practice for his key role in In re Automotive Parts Antitrust Litigation
- Best Lawyers: Best Lawyers in America (2022-present), https://www.bestlawyers.com/lawyers/steven-n-steve-williams/248790
- California Daily Journal: Selected and profiled as one of the Top 100 Lawyers in California (2022); California Lawyer Attorney of the Year (CLAY) (2022); Top Plaintiff Lawyers in California (2018-present); one of the Top Antitrust Lawyers in California (2020-present), https://www.saverilawfirm.com/press/california-daily-journal-honors-joseph-saveri-law-firm-as-2021-top-boutique-in-california
- Chambers USA: Ranked as a Band 1 or Band 2 attorney for Antitrust: Mainly Plaintiff—California (2015-present) and Antitrust: Plaintiff—Nationwide (2017-present), https://www.saverilawfirm.com/press/joseph-saveri-law-firm-achieves-top-2021-rankings-by-chambers-and-partners
- Law360: Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar (2022), https://www.saverilawfirm.com/press/steven-williams-profiled-as-2022-law360-titan-of-the-plaintiffs-bar?hsLang=en
- Lawdragon 500: Ranked as one of its 500 Leading Plaintiff Financial Lawyers (2019-present), https://www.saverilawfirm.com/press/2021-lawdragon-500-leading-plaintiff-financial-lawyers
- Martindale Hubbell: Ranked AV Preeminent (2002-present)
- Who's Who Legal: Selected as one of the top plaintiffs' attorneys worldwide via Who's Who Legal: Competition, a publication of Who's Who Legal and Global Competition Review (2014-present); selected to and profiled in Who’s Who Legal’s Thought Leaders: Competition publication (2019-present); selected to Who's Who Legal: Commercial Litigation (2021), https://whoswholegal.com/steven-n-williams
- Fordham University School of Law, J.D.
- New York University, B.A., Russian and Slavic Studies
- State of California
- State of New Jersey
- State of New York
- U.S. Supreme Court
- U.S. Court of Appeals – Second Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals – Third Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals – Fifth Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals – Sixth Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals – Ninth Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals – Eleventh Circuit
- U.S. Court of Appeals – District of Columbia Circuit
- U.S. District Court – Central District of California
- U.S. District Court – Eastern District of California
- U.S. District Court – Northern District of California
- U.S. District Court – Southern District of California
- U.S. District Court – Eastern District of Michigan
- U.S. District Court – District of New Jersey
- U.S. District Court – Eastern District of New York
- U.S. District Court – Southern District of New York
- California Discovery Subcommittee, Member
- California Lawyers Association Section on Antitrust, Executive Committee, Advisor
- California Lawyers Association Section on Privacy Law, Executive Committee, Advisor
- California Lawyers Association Section on Unfair Competition Law, Executive Committee, Advisor
- Committee to Support the Antitrust Laws, Executive Committee
- Gatepath, Chairman of the Board
- Golden State Antitrust Institute, Chair, 2017
- International Cartel Task Force, Member
- San Mateo County Bar Association, Member
Office location for Steven N. Williams
601 California St.
Suite 1000
San Francisco, CA 94108
Phone: 415-500-6800
Selections
- Super Lawyers: 2005 - 2023
Top lists
Top 100: Northern California Super Lawyers: 2016 - 2023- Top 100: 2023 Northern California Super Lawyers
- Top 100: 2022 Northern California Super Lawyers
- Top 100: 2021 Northern California Super Lawyers
- Top 100: 2020 Northern California Super Lawyers
- Top 100: 2019 Northern California Super Lawyers
- Top 100: 2018 Northern California Super Lawyers
- Top 100: 2017 Northern California Super Lawyers
- Top 100: 2016 Northern California Super Lawyers