Top rated Appellate attorney in Lakewood, ColoradoThe Noble Law Firm, LLC
Antony Noble, principal at The Noble Law Firm headquartered in Lakewood, Colorado, has vigorously represented clients on appeal for over 20 years. Mr. Noble’s practice focuses primarily on felony appeals, misdemeanor appeals and post-conviction criminal proceedings but also provides representation in the areas of juvenile appeals, dependency and neglect appeals, attorney discipline appeals, protection order appeals, civil rights appeals, civil appeals and record sealing and sex offender registration.
After earning an LL.B. in Laws, with honors, in 1996 from the prestigious University College London, Mr. Noble obtained a postgraduate diploma in legal practice in 1997 from what was then known as the College of Law in London. He is admitted to practice law in New York and Colorado and before the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit. Mr. Noble is also a member of the Tenth Circuit Criminal Justice Act Panel.
In over 500 appeals and post-conviction proceedings, Mr. Noble has had demonstrated success in the Colorado Supreme Court, the Colorado Court of Appeals, the United States Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit, as well as in multiple district and county courts in Colorado. Mr. Noble brings a client-centered approach to his practice. This focus, combined with his unparalleled integrity, hard work, dedication and considerable talent, provides the framework for his fight to achieve justice for his clients.
Mr. Noble was a member of the Board of Directors of the Colorado Criminal Defense Bar from 2009 to 2015, and he is the chair of the CCDB's Amicus Subcommittee and serves on the Professional Development Committee. He conducts numerous legal education clinics in the arenas of appellate practice, post-conviction proceedings and appellate brief writing. Mr. Noble has earned an AV Preeminent* rating from his peers through Martindale-Hubbell and holds a Superb rating through Avvo.
*AV®, AV Preeminent®, Martindale-Hubbell Distinguished and Martindale-Hubbell Notable are certification marks used under license in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies. Martindale-Hubbell® is the facilitator of a peer review rating process. Ratings reflect the anonymous opinions of members of the bar and the judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Rating™ fall into two categories – legal ability and general ethical standards.
Practice areasAppellate, Criminal Defense
- 90% Appellate
- 10% Criminal Defense
First Admitted: 2001, New York
Professional Webpage: https://noble-law.com/antonynoble.htm
- Avvo Rating of 10.0 out of 10.0
- Rising Stars section of Colorado Super Lawyers® 2010 and 2011 under the practice area of appellate law
- Colorado Super Lawyers® 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, Colorado Super Lawyers®
- Who's Who in American Law, Who's Who in American Law, Marquis, 2018
- For upholding and preserving the principles captured by Gideon v. Wainwright, Gideon Award, Colorado Criminal Defense Bar, 2010
- Highest rating available for legal ability and professional ethics, AV Preeminent (5 out of 5), Martindale-Hubbell, 2012
- People v. Cali, 2020 CO (Colo. Mar. 9, 2020); People v. Pratarelli, 2020 COA 33 (Colo. App. Feb. 27, 2020); People v. Vidauri, 2019 COA 140 (Colo. App. Sep. 5, 2019); People in the Interest of T.M.S., 454 P.3d 375 (Colo. App. 2019); People v. Chavez-Torres, 442 P.3d 843 (Colo. 2019); People v. Alvarado Hinojos, 444 P.3d 755 (Colo. 2019); Ray v. People, 440 P.3d 412 (Colo. 2019); United States v. Medina, 918 F.3d 774 (10th Cir. 2019); People v. Terry, 2019 COA 9 (Colo. App. Jan. 24, 2019); People v. Salgado, 444 P.3d 829 (Colo. App. 2019); People v. Senette, 436 P.3d 561 (Colo. App. 2018); People v. Laeke,431 P.3d 667 (Colo. App. 2018); People v. Sandoval, 413 P.3d 1274 (Colo. 2018); People in the Interest of L.K., 407 P.3d 566 (Colo. 2017); Isom v. People, 407 P.3d 559 (Colo. 2017); People in the Interest of J.W., 406 P.3d 853 (Colo. 2017); Espino-Paez v. People, 395 P.3d 786 (Colo. 2017); Flores-Heredia v. People, 395 P.3d (Colo. 2017); Estrada-Huerta v. People, 394 P.3d 1139 (Colo. 2017); People v. Chavez-Torres, 410 P.3d 690 (Colo. App. 2016); People v. Sosa, 395 P.3d 1144 (Colo. App. 2016); People v. Penn, 379 P.3d 298 (Colo. 2016); People v. Villanueva, 374 P.3d 535 (Colo. App. 2016); People v. Graves,368 P.3d 317 (Colo. 2016); People v. Chavez, 359 P.3d 1040 (Colo. 2015); People v. Douglas, 412 P.3d 785 (Colo. App. 2015); People v. Pendleton, 374 P.3d 509 (Colo. App. 2015); People v. Chipman, 370 P.3d 330 (Colo. App. 2015); People v. Isom, 410 P.3d 589 (Colo. App. 2015); United States v. Lozado, 776 F.3d 1119 (10th Cir. 2015); United States v. Margheim, 770 F.3d 1312 (10th Cir. 2014); People v. Espino-Paez, 410 P.3d 548 (Colo. App. 2014); In re: People v. Steen, 318 P.3d 487 (Colo. 2014); Dooly v. People, 302 P.3d 259 (Colo. 2013); People v. Lahr, 316 P.3d 74 (Colo. App. 2013); United States v. Hernandez, 711 F.3d 1194 (10th Cir. 2013); People v. Pleshakov, 298 P.3d 228 (Colo. 2013); Kazadi v. People, 291 P.3d 16 (Colo. 2012); Churchill v. University of Colorado, 285 P.3d 986 (Colo. 2012); People v. Ray, 302 P.3d 289 (Colo. App. 2012); People v. Laeke, 271 P.3d 1111 (Colo. 2012); People v. Kazadi, 284 P.3d 70 (Colo. App. 2011); Churchill v. Univeristy of Colorado, 293 P.3d 16 (Colo. App. 2010); People v. Sanchez, 253 P.3d 1260 (Colo. App. 2010); Crumb v. People, 230 P.3d 726 (Colo. 2010); People v. Alley, 232 P.3d 272 (Colo. App. 2010); People v. Everett, 250 P.3d 649 (Colo. App. 2010); People v. Laeke, 280 P.3d 1 (Colo. App. 2009); Edwards v. People, 196 P.3d 1138 (Colo. 2008); People v. Crumb, 203 P.3d 587 (Colo. App. 2008); United States v. Zapata, 546 F.3d 1179 (10th Cir. 2008); Leyva v. People, 184 P.3d 48 (Colo. 2008); People v. Wallin, 167 P.3d 183 (Colo. App. 2007); People v. Reese, 155 P.3d 477 (Colo. App. 2006); People v. Martinez, 128 P.3d 291 (Colo. App. 2005); Verdecia v. Adams, 327 F.3d 1171 (10th Cir. 2003); Farmer v. Perrill, 288 F.3d 1254 (10th Cir. 2002); Farmer v. Perrill, 275 F.3d 958 (10th Cir. 2001).
- Postconviction Proceedings (August 2018); Appellate Standards of Review (May 2018); Student Oral Arguments (April 2018); Postconviction Relief (April 2017); Student Oral Arguments (April 2017); Appeals (September 2016); A Child-Centered Approach to Postconviction Proceedings (April 2016); Appeals (October 2015); Appellate Rule Changes (April 2015); Appeals from County Court (November 2014); Appeals (September 2014); Laches and Other Procedural Hurdles (March 2014); Interviewing Attorneys about Postconviction Claims (February 2014); Negotiating Plea Agreements in Postconviction Proceedings (February 2014); Kazadi and Postconviction Relief (December 2013); Technology in the Practice of Criminal Law (August 2013); Appellate Brief Writing (June 2013); Making the Record (May 2013); Criminal Law Hot Topics (April 2013); Petitions for Postconviction Relief (July 2012); Postconviction Procedures (July 2012); Appeals and Postconviction Proceedings (May 2012); Direct and Cross Examination in Postconviction Proceedings (February 2012); Closing Arguments in Postconviction Proceedings (February 2012); Felony Appeals (December 2011); Adobe Acrobat for Paralegals (August 2011); Better Serving Our Clients: Holistic and Client-Centered Representation (April 2011); Appellate Brief Writing (December 2010); Petitions for Writ of Certiorari (December 2010); Making the Record CLE (September 2010); Duties and Obligations of Postconviction Counsel CLE (August 2010); Fundamentals of Appellate Practice CLE (July 2010); Making the Record CLE (June 2010); Adobe Acrobat for CJA Appellate Attorneys CLE (April 2010); Appellate Issue Selection and Brief Writing CLE (December 2009); Postconviction Ethics CLE (October 2009); Making the Record CLE (August 2009); Fundamentals of Appellate Practice CLE (May 2009); Adobe Acrobat for Appellate Attorneys CLE (April and May 2009); Electronic Appellate Records CLE (December 2008); Microsoft Word for Appellate Attorneys CLE (June 2007).
- University College London - LL.B (Hons), 1996
- New York, 2001
- CCDB's Amicus Subcommittee, Chair
- United States District Court for the District of Colorado
- Faculty of Federal Advocates
- United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
- Tenth Circuit Criminal Justice Act Panel
- Colorado, 2002
- Colorado Criminal Defense Bar, Board of Directors, 2009 to 2015
Office location for Antony Noble
215 Union Blvd
Lakewood, CO 80228
- Super Lawyers: 2019 - 2024
- Rising Stars: 2010 - 2011