Robert W. Pearce

Top rated Securities Litigation attorney in Boca Raton, Florida

Robert Wayne Pearce P.A.
Robert W. Pearce
Robert Wayne Pearce P.A.

Practice areas: Securities Litigation, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Estate & Trust Litigation; view more

Licensed in Florida since: 1982

Education: Hofstra University School of Law

Languages Spoken: English, Spanish

Selected to Super Lawyers: 2013 - 2025
Virtual Appointments Free Consultation

Robert Wayne Pearce P.A.

1499 West Palmetto Park Road
Suite 400
Boca Raton, FL 33486 Visit website

Details

Robert W. Pearce is a securities litigation attorney in Boca Raton, Florida. The founder of Robert Wayne Pearce, Mr. Pearce has over 40 years of experience resolving securities law disputes involving issues such as breach of fiduciary duty, investor representation, mismanagement of investment accounts, overconcentration of funds and unsuitable recommendations. His clients include brokers, financial professionals and investors in Boca Raton and throughout Florida.

A seasoned trial attorney, Mr. Pearce is also a certified circuit court mediator and participates in the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority mediation program. He regularly arbitrates and mediates many complex security law cases and is the author of numerous articles and blogs on securities and commodities topics.

Honored for his legal career, Mr. Pearce is the recipient of an AV Preeminent* peer review rating from Martindale-Hubbell. He is a member of the Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum, an invitation-only organization for attorneys who have recovered $1 million or more in settlements or verdicts for their clients.

A participant in many professional organizations, Mr. Pearce is a member of the Broward County Bar Association, the Palm Beach County Bar Association, the South Palm Beach County Bar Association, the Broward County Trial Lawyers Association, the Palm Beach County Justice Association, the Florida Justice Association and the American Association for Justice. He also belongs to the New York State Bar Association.

Mr. Pearce earned a bachelor’s degree from the Florida Institute of Technology and a master’s degree from Hofstra University Frank G. Zarb School of Business. He received his law degree from Hofstra University Maurice A. Deane School of Law. He holds licenses to practice law in Florida state courts, as well as in federal courts in both Florida and New York.

*AV®, AV Preeminent®, Martindale-Hubbell Distinguished and Martindale-Hubbell Notable are certification marks used under license in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies. Martindale-Hubbell® is the facilitator of a peer review rating process. Ratings reflect the anonymous opinions of members of the bar and the judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Rating™ fall into two categories – legal ability and general ethical standards.

Practice areas

Securities Litigation, Alternative Dispute Resolution, Estate & Trust Litigation, Securities & Corporate Finance

Focus areas

Arbitration, Mediation, Securities Law

  • 50% Securities Litigation
  • 30% Alternative Dispute Resolution
  • 10% Estate & Trust Litigation
  • 10% Securities & Corporate Finance

First Admitted: 1980, New York

Professional Webpage: https://www.secatty.com/robert-w-pearce.html

Bar/Professional Activity:
  • New York, 1980
  • Florida Justice Association
  • Palm Beach County Bar Association
  • South Palm Beach County Bar Association
  • U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida
  • U.S. District Court Southern District of New York
  • American Association for Justice
  • Broward County Justice Association
  • Public Investor Arbitration Bar Association
  • New York Bar Association, 1980
  • U.S. District Court Northern District of Florida
  • U.S. Court of Appeals 11th Circuit
  • Broward County Bar Association
  • Palm Beach County Justice Association
  • Florida Bar, 1982, 1982
  • U.S. District Court Middle District of Florida
  • U.S. District Court Eastern District of New York
Verdicts/Settlements (Case Results):
  • ATTORNEY ROBERT PEARCE’S PROVEN RESULTS FOR INVESTORS   Attorney Robert Pearce has represented hundreds of investors over his 40 year career and in the last 20 years alone he obtained judgments, arbitration awards and settlements of over $125 million for his investor clients. Mr. Pearce has recovered funds for over 99% of his investor clients. Attorney Pearce has tried over 100 cases to trial verdict or arbitration award and only lost 4 cases for investors in his 40 year career.  No attorney representing investors in South Florida has more experience or proven results than Mr. Pearce.  A partial history of Attorney Pearce’s results for investors is listed below:  
  • Federal Court Final Judgment $21,041,285   Case No.  1:10-cv-21444-KMM College Health and Investment, Ltd. v Esther Spero   This Final Judgment was entered against the defendant for fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and civil theft pursuant to Sections 812.014 and 772.11, Florida statutes in 2010.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $8,500,000   This FINRA Arbitration involved Puerto Rico investors who claimed their Puerto Rico broker-dealer over-concentrated and over-leveraged their accounts in Puerto Rico municipal bonds and further made unsuitable recommendations to “hold” those positions when it knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled prior the arbitration hearing in 2021. , 2020
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $8,214,596 This FINRA Arbitration involved, Texas residents who claimed their financial advisor misrepresented and fully failed to disclose the risk of using a highly leveraged credit spread strategy.  Further, the clients alleged that the financial advisor associated with a major investment bank placed all of their assets in his unsuitable investment strategy.  The account was overleveraged and vulnerable in March 2020 to massive liquidations of securities to meet margin calls at fire sale prices.  The case settled prior to the arbitration hearing in January, 2022.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $7,840,000   This FINRA arbitration involved a complex options trading strategy in the oil and gas sector for a Brazilian holding company against one of the largest Midwest broker-dealers in United States and resolved through mediation on the eve of trial in 2010.   
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $6,000,000   This FINRA arbitration against a major broker-dealer in the United States and its off-shore subsidiary involved over-concentration of accounts in Puerto Rico municipal bonds and closed-end funds and unsuitable “hold” recommendations when the broker-dealers knew market conditions were perilous.  It settled midway through the arbitration proceeding in 2017 for $6 million even though the broker-dealers claimed the clients’ accounts had received millions of dollars in profits over many years.  
  • FINRA Arbitration Award $5,887,498 Case No. 17-02354 Jose E. Blanco Garrido, et al. v. UBS Financial Services Inc. of PR, et al.  This FINRA arbitration against UBS Financial Services, Inc. and UBS Financial Services Inc. of Puerto Rico involve the overconcentration of Mr. Blanco’s family’s assets in Puerto Rico municipal bonds and closed-end bond funds.  The arbitrators awarded substantially all of the Blanco family losses and over $1.5 million prejudgment interest and all of the litigation expenses, $170,000, arising out of an unsuitable recommendation to “hold” their Puerto Rico securities in the fall of 2012 when market conditions were perilous. The arbitration award was entered in favor of the Blanco family after 40 hearing sessions in 2019.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $5,500,000  This FINRA arbitration against a major broker-dealer in the United States for its off-shore subsidiary involved overconcentration of Puerto Rico municipal bonds and closed-end funds in an overleveraged account and unsuitable “hold” recommendations when the broker-dealer knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled just days before the arbitration proceeding in 2022.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $5,000,000 This FINRA Arbitration involved Texas residents who claimed their financial advisor misrepresented and fully failed to disclose the risk of using a highly leveraged credit spread strategy.  Further, the clients alleged that the financial advisor associated with a major investment bank placed all their assets in his unsuitable investment strategy.  The account was overleveraged and vulnerable in March 2020 to massive liquidations of securities to meet margin calls at fire sale prices.  The case settled prior to the arbitration hearing in September 2023.
  • Federal Court Class Action Settlement $4,300,000   Case No.  14-001695-CI State of Florida, Office of Financial Regulation v. Tri-Med Corp., et al.   Mr. Pearce represented the investors as co-counsel with the Receiver in a class action against the accounting and legal professionals for allegedly aiding and abetting a Ponzi scheme.  After removal from state to Federal court and several years of litigation, the lawsuit was resolved in 2017 through mediation and the payment of more than $4.3 million to the receivership for the investors benefit by the law and accounting firms.
  • Florida State Court Settlement $3,500,000   This $3.5 million settlement was in a state court action filed by Mr. Pearce on behalf of a trust for an elderly widow was against one of the largest corporate trustees in the country.  The corporate trustee allegedly failed to diversify a concentrated portfolio in a single stock during the 2008-2009 financial market meltdown.  The case was settled in 2010 for substantially all of the widow’s losses she was entitled within the short six-month statutory window for bringing a claim against trustees and Florida.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $3,350,000   This FINRA Arbitration involved Puerto Rico investors who claimed their Puerto Rico broker-dealer overconcentrated and overleveraged their accounts in Puerto Rico municipal bonds and further made unsuitable recommendations to “hold” those positions when it knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled on the eve of the arbitration hearing in 2018.
  • FINRA Arbitration Award $3,266,200   Case No. 90-01044 Jack Friedlander, et al. v. Margaretten Securities   This arbitration involved misrepresentations and unsuitable recommendations that Claimants invest in complex structured products consisting of stripped coupon mortgage-backed securities and pass through certificates.  The Claimants were awarded punitive damages and attorney fees and expenses.
  • FINRA Arbitration Award $2,752,049   Case No. 10-03554 College Health and Investment, Ltd. v Wells Fargo Advisors LLC   This FINRA Arbitration by College Health against Wells Fargo Advisors followed a Federal court proceeding for aiding and abetting the defendant in that case in the theft of funds from the family holding company’s brokerage account at the firm.
  • FINRA Arbitration Award $2,554,896  Case Number 18-03816 Elizabeth Snyder, et al. v. Barry Snyder, et al.  The claims in this FINRA Arbitration was settled against two of the Respondents and went to hearing with the third Respondent, Barry Snyder.  In April 2015, Mr. Snyder became an investment advisor with discretionary authority over multiple accounts for his ex-wife, Elizabeth Snyder.  He immediately engaged in a highly leveraged overly concentrated and therefore unsuitable investment strategy which resulted in Mrs. Snyder losing millions of dollars in several months.   In September 2021, after 5 days of hearings, the arbitrators awarded Mrs. Snyder $2,554,896.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $2,500,000   This FINRA Arbitration involved Puerto Rico investors who claimed their Puerto Rico broker-dealer overconcentrated their accounts in Puerto Rico municipal bonds and further made an unsuitable recommendation to “hold” those positions when it knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled in 2019.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $2,450,000   This FINRA arbitration against a major broker-dealer in the United States and its off-shore subsidiary involved overconcentration of Puerto Rico municipal bonds and closed-end funds and unsuitable “hold” recommendations when the broker-dealer knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled at the 11th hour before the arbitration proceeding in 2019.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $2,300,000   This FINRA Arbitration involved a Puerto Rico investor who claimed her Puerto Rico broker-dealer overconcentrated her accounts in Puerto Rico municipal bonds and closed-end bond funds and further made unsuitable recommendations to “hold” those positions when it knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled in 2017 for an amount far in excess of what the broker-dealer claimed to be her damages.
  • Florida Probate Court Settlement $1,900,000   In this Probate court matter, Attorney Pearce represented several family members in a lawsuit against legal and financial professionals and others for their undue influence over an elderly person in conveying his investments and other assets prior to his death.  The suit was settled during a mediation in 2007 for $1.9 million.
  • FINRA Arbitration Award $1,817,296   Case No. 09-02697 Gerald J. Kazma, et al. v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc., et al.   The Kazma Family filed an arbitration claim against Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. for losses arising out of a complex municipal arbitrage structured products commonly known as the MAT/ASTA products which were allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis.  Mr. Pearce represented scores of investors in connection with the failed MAT/ASTA structured product debacle.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $1,513,000   This FINRA Arbitration involved a Puerto Rico investor who claimed her Puerto Rico broker-dealer overconcentrated her accounts in Puerto Rico municipal bonds and closed-end bond funds and further made unsuitable recommendations to “hold” those positions when it knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled in 2019 for an amount far in excess of what the broker-dealer claimed to be her damages.
  • FINRA Arbitration Award $1,450,000   Case No. 14-01541 Christel Marie Bengoa Lopez v UBS Financial Services, Inc., et al.   This FINRA arbitration against UBS Financial Services, Inc. and UBS Financial Services Inc. of Puerto Rico involved the overconcentration of Ms. Bengoa’s assets in Puerto Rico municipal bonds and closed-end bond funds pledged against a line of credit.  In 2013 and thereafter, the financial advisor made multiple “hold” recommendations when it was clearly unsuitable to do so.  The arbitrators awarded Ms. Bengoa seven figures, including attorney’s fees and all of her litigation expenses in 2016, even though the brokerage firms argued her account had no net out-of-pocket damages.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $1,400,000   This FINRA arbitration against a major broker-dealer in the United States and its off-shore subsidiary involved overconcentration of Puerto Rico municipal bonds and closed-end funds and unsuitable “hold” recommendations when the broker-dealer knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled in 2019 for $1.4 million even though the broker-dealer claimed the clients’ accounts had over a millions dollars in profits.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $1,300,000   This FINRA arbitration against a major broker-dealer in the United States and its off-shore subsidiary involved overconcentration of Puerto Rico municipal bonds and closed-end funds and unsuitable “hold” recommendations by the broker-dealers when they knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled in 2019 for $1.3 million even though the broker-dealer claimed the clients’ accounts had millions dollars in profits. 
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $1,250,000   This FINRA arbitration against a major broker-dealer in the United States and its off-shore subsidiary involved overconcentration of Puerto Rico municipal bonds and closed-end funds and unsuitable “hold” recommendations by the broker-dealer when they knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled in 2017 for $1.25 million even though the broker-dealer claimed the clients’ accounts had hundreds of thousands of dollars in profits. 
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $1,200,000   This FINRA arbitration against a major broker-dealer in the United States and its off-shore subsidiary involved overconcentration of Puerto Rico municipal bonds and closed-end funds and unsuitable “hold” recommendations when the broker-dealer knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled in 2019 for $1.2 million even though the broker-dealers claimed the clients’ accounts had hundreds of thousands of dollars in profits.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $1,200,000   This FINRA arbitration was settled for $1.2 million by a major Wall Street firm in 2009 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $1,116,700   This FINRA arbitration was settled for over $1.1 million by a major Wall Street firm in 2011 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $1,100,000   This FINRA Arbitration involved Puerto Rico investors who claimed their Puerto Rico broker-dealer overconcentrated their accounts in Puerto Rico municipal bonds and further made an unsuitable recommendation to “hold” those positions when they knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled in 2020 for $1.1 million. 
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $1,100,000 This FINRA Arbitration involved Puerto Rico investors who claimed their Puerto Rico broker-dealer overconcentrated their accounts in Puerto Rico municipal bonds and further made an unsuitable recommendation to “hold” those positions when they knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled in 2020 for $1.1 million. 
  • FINRA Arbitration Award $1,030,909   Case No. 03-06176 Gary A. Friedman, et al. v. Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, Inc.   This case arose out of the underwriting for stock ratings scandal involving Merrill Lynch’s brokerage and investment banking divisions during the 2000-2002 stock market crash.  The arbitrators not only awarded compensatory damages to Mr. Friedman but punitive damages against the firm for knowingly publishing false ratings that investors would rely upon in making their investment decisions. 
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $1,025,000   This FINRA arbitration was settled for over $1 million by a major Wall Street firm in 2010 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $950,000   This FINRA arbitration was settled for $950,000 by a major Wall Street firm in 2012 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $950,000   This FINRA arbitration against a major broker-dealer in the United States and its off-shore subsidiary involved over-concentration of accounts in Puerto Rico municipal bonds and closed-end funds and unsuitable “hold” recommendations when the broker-dealers knew market conditions were perilous.  It settled at the end of the arbitration proceeding in 2017 for $950,000 even though the broker-dealer claimed the clients’ accounts had thousands of dollars in profits over many years.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $925,000   This FINRA arbitration was settled for $925,000 by a major Wall Street firm in 2012 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis.
  • Pre-FINRA Arbitration Settlement $925,000   This was one of those rare cases where a pre-arbitration filing settlement was achieved with a major independent broker operation.  The underlying case arose out of a rogue broker’s misrepresentations, mismanagement, selling away and misappropriation of funds from multiple clients in the Midwest. It was settled by the group for $925,000 in 2014 prior to the filing of the arbitration claim.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $900,000   This FINRA arbitration against a major broker-dealer in the United States and its off-shore subsidiary involved over-concentration of accounts in Puerto Rico municipal bonds and closed-end funds and unsuitable “hold” recommendations when the broker-dealers knew market conditions were perilous.  It settled prior to the arbitration proceeding in 2021 for $900,000 even though the broker-dealer claimed the clients’ accounts had thousands of dollars in profits over many years. , 2020
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $900,000   This FINRA Arbitration involved Puerto Rico investors who claimed their Puerto Rico broker-dealer overconcentrated their accounts in Puerto Rico municipal bonds and further made an unsuitable recommendation to “hold” those positions when it knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled in 2019 for $900,000.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $875,000   This FINRA arbitration was settled for $925,000 by a major Wall Street firm in 2012 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $850,000   This FINRA Arbitration involved a Puerto Rico education institution that claimed its Puerto Rico broker-dealer overconcentrated and overleveraged its account in Puerto Rico municipal bonds and further made an unsuitable recommendation to “hold” those positions when it knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled in 2018 for $850,000 despite the broker-dealers argument the school profited from these investments over many years.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $840,000   This FINRA Arbitration involved an elderly Puerto Rico widow who claimed her Puerto Rico broker-dealers overconcentrated her accounts in Puerto Rico municipal bonds on margin and further made an unsuitable recommendation to “hold” those positions when they knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled in 2017 for $840,000 with the three firms who blamed one another for the damages suffered.
  • Florida State Court Settlement $775,000   This case was filed by a small business that deposited its cash reserves to be managed by a corporate trustee and investment advisory firm on a short term basis since it was earmarked for expansion purposes.  Instead, the major Florida bank, who the business entrusted its savings to manage conservatively for a fee, speculated in technology and other stocks during the stock market bubble in the 2000-2002 time period.  In a bitterly fought state court action, the bank finally agreed in 2004 at mediation to pay the business the $775,000 it lost due the mismanagement of the business account.  
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $775,000   This FINRA arbitration was settled for $925,000 by a major Wall Street firm in 2009 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $775,000   This FINRA arbitration against a major broker-dealer in the United States and its off-shore subsidiary involved over-concentration of accounts in Puerto Rico municipal bonds and closed-end funds and unsuitable “hold” recommendations when the broker-dealers knew market conditions were perilous.  It settled at the end of the arbitration proceeding in 2017 for $775,000 even though the broker-dealer claimed the clients’ accounts had thousands of dollars in profits over many years.
  •  FINRA Arbitration Settlement $750,000   This FINRA arbitration was for negligence by a major Wall Street brokerage involving a merger and failure to sell a technology stock received in connection with that merger.  The case was settled during a mediation in 2005 for $750,000.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $750,000   This FINRA arbitration against a major broker-dealer in the United States and its off-shore subsidiary involved overconcentration of accounts in Puerto Rico municipal bonds and closed-end funds and unsuitable “hold” recommendations when the broker-dealers knew market conditions were perilous.  It settled just before the arbitration proceeding in 2019 for $750,000 even though the broker-dealer claimed the clients’ accounts had thousands of dollars in profits over many years.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $750,000  This FINRA Arbitration involved a couple that claimed their Puerto Rico broker-dealer overconcentrated their account in Puerto Rico municipal bonds and further made an unsuitable recommendation to “hold” those positions when it knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled in 2020 for $750,000 despite the broker-dealers argument the couple profited from these investments over many years.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $725,000   This FINRA arbitration involved a group of investors who held accounts with a small broker-dealer and investment advisory firm.  The investors alleged that their financial advisor who managed their accounts “cherry picked” many of the profitable transactions for himself at the end of the trading day to their detriment.  It settled in 2009 for $725,000 in a rare case with contributions from the small firms clearing broker.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $700,000   This FINRA arbitration against a major broker-dealer in the United States and its off-shore subsidiary involved overconcentration of accounts in Puerto Rico municipal bonds and closed-end funds and unsuitable “hold” recommendations when the broker-dealers knew market conditions were perilous.  It settled just before the arbitration proceeding in 2018 for $700,000 even though the broker-dealer claimed the clients’ accounts had thousands of dollars in profits over many years.  
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $685,000   This FINRA arbitration was filed by a group of investors against an independent brokerage firm operation with office throughout the United States for failing to do its due diligence in connection with several oil and gas limited partnerships.  It took an interesting twist and turn when the broker dealer filed a motion to dismiss under the FINRA 6 year Eligibility Rule thinking that would end the case. Instead, Attorney Pearce and the investors crafted a class action complaint to be filed if the brokerage did not settle the dispute which it did in 2016 for $685,000.
  • Florida State Court Judgment $669,931   Case No. 50 2013 CA 012367 XXXX MB Adams Moore v Jeffrey M Bell, et al.   This lawsuit involved the solicitation of Florida investor to make a “guaranteed” investment in a mortgage funding business which failed.  Attorney Pearce obtained a Summary Judgement and quickly garnished assets located in the State of Washington before a bankruptcy proceeding was filed by the promoter and his businesses.  This Judgment and Garnishment then became the subject of a bankruptcy proceeding which was finally resolved by payment of the garnishment proceeds to Mr. Moore.
  • FINRA Arbitration Award $662,190   Case No. 14-00657 Said Mudafort Farah v UBS Financial Services Incorporated of PR   This was just the second of scores of FINRA arbitration against UBS Financial Services, Inc. and UBS Financial Services Inc. of Puerto Rico that went to a final hearing.  It  involved the overconcentration of Mr. Mudafort’s assets in Puerto Rico denominated municipal bonds and closed-end bond funds and unsuitable “hold” recommendation in March 2013 when the broker dealers knew market conditions were perilous.  The arbitrators awarded Mr. Mudafort $662,190 in 2015 even though the brokerage firms argued his account had hundreds of thousands of dollars in profits; i.e., no net out-of-pocket damages.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $625,000   This FINRA arbitration was settled for $625,000 by a major Wall Street firm in 2010 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis.  It was the first of these municipal arbitrage cases tried in the United States and went so well that at the end of the case the broker dealer paid a substantial settlement to avoid what it perceived to be a dangerous precedent for settlement of future cases.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $615,000  This FINRA arbitration was initiated after our client discovered  her advisor misappropriated her funds intended for investment. The advisor concealed his fraud with fraudulent statements. The advisor’s employer settled the dispute for the full amount demanded in September 2023.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $575,000   This FINRA arbitration was settled with a family of investors for $575,000 by a major Wall Street firm in 2010 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis.
  • FINRA Arbitration Award $573,200   Case No. 91-02022 Cheri Brown v American Capital   This arbitration involved the offer and sale of penny stocks and other securities that were not registered and offered and sold through misrepresentations and omissions in a manipulated market.  The Arbitration Panel found numerous sales practice violations under Florida securities statutes in awarding $573,000 to Ms. Brown.
  • Pre-Suit Settlement $565,342   This case involved the fraudulent sale of equity indexed annuities to an elderly investor with diminished capacity by an insurance agent in Florida.  Attorney Pearce was able to negotiate the repurchase of all the annuities by the issuer for full value without firing a shot in court.
  • FINRA Arbitration Award $552,000  Case No. 22-01789; Pamela Joy Borders, Individually and Trustee v. UBS Financial Services, Inc.  This FINRA arbitration involved a Texas resident who claimed her financial advisor David Barnes at UBS Financial Services, Inc. made unsuitable “hold” recommendations, misrepresented and fully failed to disclose the risk of a highly leveraged account concentrated in the oil and gas sector. The account was overconcentrated and overleveraged and vulnerable in March 2020 to massive liquidations of securities to meet margin calls at fire sale prices.  This arbitration resulted in an arbitration award of not only compensatory damages, but attorney fees and interest in June 2023.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $550,000   This FINRA arbitration filed against to broker-dealers arose out of the offer and sale of concentrated positions in penny stocks by a salesman who moved from one firm to another and encouraged the investor to “hold” the securities, in a margin account as they steadily declined in value.  Eventually, the investor was forced to liquidate all of the securities and realize his losses.  It settled in 2016 for $550,000 with contributions from both broker-dealers.
  • FINRA Arbitration Award $545,500   Case No. 90-02875 Larry Witte, as Guardian of Teresa Bill v. Raymond James & Associates, Inc.   This arbitration involved a Raymond James stockbroker who misrepresented and made unsuitable recommendations to an elderly incompetent widow that she invest in options and illiquid limited partnerships in violation of the Florida securities and civil theft statutes.  The total award of $545,000 included rescission of the limited partnership investments under 517.211, Fla. Stat., treble damages for violation of the civil theft statute 772.11, Fla. Stat. and attorney fees.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $510,000   This FINRA arbitration was settled with a family investment holding company for $510,000 by a major Wall Street firm in 2010 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $500,000   This FINRA Arbitration involved Puerto Rico investors who claimed their Puerto Rico broker-dealer over-concentrated and over-leveraged their accounts in Puerto Rico municipal bonds and further made unsuitable recommendations to “hold” those positions when it knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled prior to the arbitration hearing in May, 2021. 
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $500,000   This FINRA Arbitration involved Puerto Rico investors who claimed their Puerto Rico broker-dealer over-concentrated and over-leveraged their accounts in Puerto Rico municipal bonds and further made unsuitable recommendations to “hold” those positions when it knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled prior to the arbitration hearing in May, 2021. 
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $500,000   This FINRA arbitration involved unsuitable recommendations, misrepresentations and mismanagement of two elderly investors trust accounts by an investment advisor of a major Wall Street brokerage.  It was settled for $500,000 in 2004 with the successor trustee on behalf of the husband who died while the arbitration was pending and his survivor wife of 60 years.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $500,000   This FINRA arbitration was settled with a family investment holding company for $500,000 by a major Wall Street firm in 2012 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $499,000   This FINRA arbitration involved a misrepresented financial plan to allocate the investor’s assets in a diversified portfolio.  Instead, the salesperson made unsuitable investments and churned the investor’s accounts and caused substantial damages which were fully recovered in a settlement in 2005 for just under a half of a million dollars.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $495,000    This FINRA Arbitration involved a Florida resident who claimed her financial advisor misrepresented and fully failed to disclose the risk of using a securities backed loans, failing to disclose penalties upon payment of securities backed loans, and failing to follow a client’s instructions to sell securities and pay down securities backed loans.  The case settled prior to the arbitration hearing in August, 2021.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $490,000   This FINRA Arbitration involved an elderly Puerto Rico widow who claimed her Puerto Rico broker-dealers overconcentrated her accounts in Puerto Rico municipal bonds and closed-end bond funds and further made an unsuitable recommendation to “hold” those positions when they knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled in 2018 for $490,000 with the two affiliated brokerage firms for substantially all of the damages suffered.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $475,000   This arbitration was filed by a family residing in Costa Rica, on behalf of their mother’s investment holding company, against the major Wall Street brokerage firm with operations throughout Central America.  The family was given a financial plan to grow their investments for their retirement.  But the financial advisor did not adhere to the plan recommended and instead invested in technology stocks which crashed during the 2000-2002 time period.  The investors were able to recover substantially all of their investment losses, $475,000, at mediation in 2007. 
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $467,000   This FINRA arbitration was settled with a husband and wife for $467,000 by a major Wall Street firm in 2011 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $460,000   This FINRA arbitration against a major broker-dealer in the United States and its off-shore subsidiary involved over-concentration of accounts in Puerto Rico municipal bonds and closed-end funds and unsuitable “hold” recommendations when the broker-dealers knew market conditions were perilous.  It settled just before the arbitration proceeding in 2019 for $460,000 even though the broker-dealer claimed the clients’ accounts had thousands of dollars in profits over many years.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $450,000   This FINRA Arbitration involved a Puerto Rico investor who claimed his Puerto Rico broker-dealer over-concentrated their accounts in Puerto Rico municipal bonds and further made an unsuitable recommendation to “hold” those positions when it knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled in 2020 for $450,000., 2020
  • Florida State Court Settlement $450,000   This lawsuit filed in Florida state court against several defendants for fraudulently misrepresenting an investment in a gold and silver mine to an elderly investor with diminished capacity.  The Defendants settled by agreeing to make payments on an installment basis for substantially all of the damages suffered.  The settlement includes a “hammer provision” to deter defendants from defaulting on their obligation.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $450,000  This FINRA arbitration involved a Florida resident who claimed her financial advisor who made unsuitable recommendations, misrepresented and fully failed to disclose the risk of two structured product investments which constituted 100% of the assets in her account. The claims were settled approximately one month before the final hearing scheduled in March 2023.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $445,000   This FINRA arbitration against a major broker-dealer in the United States and its off-shore subsidiary involved overconcentration of accounts in Puerto Rico municipal bonds and closed-end funds involving a credit line and a margin account and unsuitable “hold” recommendations when the broker-dealers knew market conditions were perilous.  It settled just before the arbitration proceeding in 2019 for $445,000 even though the broker-dealer claimed the clients’ accounts had thousands of dollars in profits over many years.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $437,000   This FINRA Arbitration involved a Puerto Rico investor who claimed his Puerto Rico broker-dealer overconcentrated their accounts in Puerto Rico municipal bonds and further made an unsuitable recommendation to “hold” those positions when it knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled in 2019 for $437,000.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $435,000   This FINRA arbitration was settled with a family for $435,000 by a major Wall Street firm in 2012 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $431,000   This FINRA arbitration was settled with an individual investor for $431,000 by a major Wall Street firm in 2012 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $425,000   This FINRA arbitration was filed, tried and settled midway during the arbitration proceeding.  It involved unsuitable investment recommendations and churning of the customer’s account by a rogue broker.  Investor recovered substantially all of her losses, $425,000, in 2011 when this case settled.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $425,000   This FINRA arbitration involved a Private Placement securities transaction that was misrepresented by the broker dealer and its financial advisor.  The broker dealer failed to do its due diligence and discover material facts which would have deterred any investor from purchasing the participation units and promissory notes sold to this investor.  The brokerage firm settled this dispute during a mediation in 2015 for substantially the entire amount of the investment, $425,000.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $422,000   This FINRA arbitration was settled with an individual investor for $422,000 by a major Wall Street firm in 2011 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis. 
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $412,605   This FINRA arbitration was settled with an individual investor for $412,605 by a major Wall Street firm in 2012 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $410,000   This FINRA arbitration involved a Private Placement securities transaction that was misrepresented by the broker dealer and its financial advisor.  The broker dealer failed to do its due diligence and discover material facts which would have deterred any investor from purchasing the participation units and promissory notes sold to this investor.  The brokerage firm settled this dispute during a mediation in 2013 for substantially the entire amount of the investment.  
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $410,000   This FINRA arbitration against a major broker-dealer in the United States and its off-shore subsidiary involved overconcentration of Puerto Rico municipal bonds and closed-end funds and unsuitable “hold” recommendations when the broker-dealer knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled in 2017 for $410,000 even though the broker-dealer claimed the clients’ accounts had over a millions dollars in profits.  
  • Florida State Court Settlement $407,500   This $407,500 million settlement was in a state court action filed by Mr. Pearce against a Canadian brokerage that was offering and selling securities in Florida without being licensed.  It involved proceedings in Canada and Florida and Appellate courts. It ultimately led to the legislature enacting an exemption for Canadian brokerages but not until Mr. Pearce client was paid for what was evidently a violation of the Florida securities statutes at the time.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $400,000   This FINRA arbitration was settled with an individual investor for $400,000 by a major Wall Street firm in 2010 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis.
  • FINRA Arbitration Award $386,600   Case No. 90-00108 Weiss v. Profile Investments, Inc.   This arbitration involved Profile Investment stockbrokers who misrepresented and made unsuitable recommendations to an elderly gentlemen to invest in stocks and warrants in violation of the Florida securities and civil theft statutes. The total award of $386,000 included damages under 517.211, Fla. Stat., treble damages for violation of the civil theft statute 772.11, Fla. Stat. and attorney fees.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $385,000  This FINRA Arbitration involved a Puerto Rico investor who claimed her Puerto Rico broker-dealer overconcentrated her account in Puerto Rico municipal bonds and further made an unsuitable recommendation to “hold” those positions when it knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled in 2020 for $385,000 despite the broker-dealers argument she profited from these investments over many years.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $380,000   This FINRA Arbitration involved Puerto Rico investors who claimed their Puerto Rico broker-dealer over-concentrated and overleveraged their accounts in Puerto Rico municipal bonds and further made unsuitable recommendations to “hold” those positions when it knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled on the eve of the arbitration hearing in 2018.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $360,000   This FINRA arbitration against a major broker-dealer in the United States and its off-shore subsidiary involved overconcentration of Puerto Rico municipal bonds and closed-end funds and unsuitable “hold” recommendations when the broker-dealer knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled in 2018 for $360,000 even though the broker-dealer claimed the clients’ accounts had thousands of dollars in profits.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $350,000   This FINRA arbitration against a major broker-dealer in the United States and its off-shore subsidiary involved overconcentration of Puerto Rico municipal bonds and closed-end funds and unsuitable “hold” recommendations when the broker-dealer knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled in 2017 for $350,000 even though the broker-dealer claimed the clients’ accounts had over a hundred thousand dollars in profits.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $347,500   This FINRA arbitration against a major broker-dealer in the United States and its off-shore subsidiary involved overconcentration of Puerto Rico municipal bonds and closed-end funds and unsuitable “hold” recommendations when the broker-dealer knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled in 2015 for $347,000.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $341,601   This FINRA arbitration was settled with an individual investor for $341,601 by a major Wall Street firm in 2012 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $335,000  The claims in this arbitration arose out of misrepresentations and misleading statements to induce our clients to purchase membership interests in Celadon Technology Fund VII (“Fund VII”). The Respondent was the Placement Agent for Fund VII and responsible for conducting the “due diligence” investigation necessary to make sure all communications to prospective investors were truthful and make full disclosure of all material facts to investors to comply with the Federal and state securities laws. It was settled prior to hearing in December 2022.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $323,195   This FINRA arbitration was settled with an individual investor for $323,195 by a major Wall Street firm in 2012 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $320,000   This FINRA arbitration was settled with an individual investor for $320,000 by a major Wall Street firm in 2012 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $314,000   This FINRA arbitration was settled with an individual investor for $314,000 by a major Wall Street firm in 2012 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $312,500   This FINRA arbitration involved unsuitable investment recommendations and excessive trading otherwise known as churning of the investors account by the same broker at two different brokerage firms.  One brokerage paid the investor $162,500 and the other paid $150,000 after a mediation that occurred in 2012 for a total settlement of $312,500.
  • Pre-FINRA Arbitration Settlement $312,000   This case arose out of a rogue broker’s misrepresentations, mismanagement, selling away and misappropriation of funds from multiple clients in the Midwest.  It was settled by the group for $312,000 in 2015 prior to the filing of the arbitration claim.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $300,000   This case was filed by a retired investor who deposited his savings with a major Florida bank to manage for a fee in a retirement program.  Instead, the bank officer speculated in technology and other stocks which crashed during the stock market bubble in the 2000-2002 time period.  In a bitterly fought state court action, the bank finally agreed in 2006 at mediation to pay the investor the $300,000 he lost due the mismanagement of the retirement account.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $300,000   This FINRA arbitration against a major broker-dealer in the United States and its off-shore subsidiary involved overconcentration of Puerto Rico municipal bonds and closed-end funds and unsuitable “hold” recommendations when the broker-dealer knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled in 2016 for $300,000.  
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $200,000   This FINRA Arbitration involved Puerto Rico investors who claimed their Puerto Rico broker-dealer over-concentrated and over-leveraged their accounts in Puerto Rico municipal bonds and further made unsuitable recommendations to “hold” those positions when it knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled prior to the arbitration hearing in May 2021. 
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $300,000   This FINRA arbitration was settled with an individual investor for $300,000 by a major Wall Street firm in 2012 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis. 
  • Florida State Court Settlement $300,000   This Florida state court action involved the collection of, a promissory note which served as a guarantee of an investment.  The dispute was settled after a Final Judgments was received and garnishment actions were instituted against 3rd parties related to the defendant.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $300,000   This FINRA Arbitration involved Puerto Rico investors who claimed their Puerto Rico broker-dealer over-concentrated their accounts in Puerto Rico municipal bonds and further made an unsuitable recommendation to “hold” those positions when it knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled in 2019. 
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $295,000  This FINRA Arbitration involved Puerto Rico investors who claimed their Puerto Rico broker-dealer over-concentrated their accounts in Puerto Rico municipal bonds and further made an unsuitable recommendation to “hold” those positions when it knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled in 2020
  • FINRA Arbitration Award $287,500   Case No. 91-01913 Leung v Wakefield Financial, Inc.   This arbitration involved Wakefield Financial stockbrokers who misrepresented and made unsuitable recommendations to investors in connection with an option trading program in violation of the Florida securities.  The total award of $287,500 included damages under 517.211, Fla. Stat. and attorney fees.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $286,000   This FINRA Arbitration involved a novice Puerto Rico investor who won the lottery.  After she deposited her winnings with Puerto Rico broker-dealer, the financial advisor over-concentrated and overleveraged her accounts in Puerto Rico municipal bonds and further made unsuitable recommendations to “hold” those positions when it knew market conditions were perilous.  Shortly thereafter, the account was forcibly liquidated to meet margin calls.  The case settled on the eve of the arbitration hearing in 2015 at mediation.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $283,500   This FINRA arbitration was settled with an individual investor for $283,500 by a major Wall Street firm in 2013 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis.
  • FINRA Arbitration Award $275,000   Case No.  03-03539 Michael A. and Joann Collegio v Morgan Stanley DW, Inc.   This investor suffered a broken neck and back and received the lawsuit settlement.  She then proceeded to invest with Morgan Stanley.  The investor had no experience investing in the stock market.  The Morgan Stanley financial advisor recommended dividing the lawsuit proceeds into several counts managed by different portfolio managers to safeguard the principal, and generate income for the injured investor.  Instead of doing what was promised, the assets were concentrated in aggressive growth stocks whose market capitalizations were collapsing and not generating any dividend income.  To further compound the risk, the Morgan Stanley financial advisor recommended that this paralyzed man purchase a home with a mortgage pledged against the assets in his brokerage account.  As the technology market collapsed, margin calls were issued and the securities in the brokerage account were liquidated to meet those calls.  The arbitrators entered an award in 2004 for the $275,000 loss due to the unsuitable recommendations. 
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $270,000   This FINRA arbitration against a major broker-dealer in the United States and its off-shore subsidiary involved overconcentration of Puerto Rico municipal bonds and closed-end funds and unsuitable “hold” recommendations when the broker-dealer knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled in 2015 for $270,000 even though the broker-dealer claimed the clients’ accounts had over a hundred thousand dollars in profits.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $260,000   This FINRA arbitration was settled with an individual investor for $260,000 by a major Wall Street firm in 2010 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis. 
  • FINRA Arbitration Award $257,000   Case No. 92-00340 Koppel v JW Charles, Inc.   This arbitration involved misrepresentations and unsuitable investments in connection with an option trading strategy in violation of the Florida securities statutes.  The Arbitration Panel made a full award, including attorney fees, under the securities law statutes to this investor in the amount of $257,000.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $251,099   This FINRA arbitration was settled with an individual investor for $251,099 by a major Wall Street firm in 2013 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis. 
  • Pre-Suit Settlement $250,000   This case was settled during the course of a pre-suit mediation between a young widow and her deceased husband’s accountant of many years.  The accountant was also a registered investment adviser.  He recommended an unsuitable insurance-based retirement program and the improper asset allocation and mismanagement of a discretionary account and received $168,000 in undisclosed commissions.  Our client received back the undisclosed commission and more in a settlement at the 2006 mediation.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $250,000  This FINRA arbitration against a major broker-dealer in the United States and its off-shore subsidiary involved overconcentration of Puerto Rico municipal bonds and closed-end funds and unsuitable “hold” recommendations when the broker-dealer knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled in 2020 for $250,000 even though the broker-dealer claimed the clients’ accounts had tens of thousands of dollars in profits. 
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $240,000   This FINRA arbitration was settled with an individual investor for $240,000 by a major Wall Street firm in 2012 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $235,000  This arbitration arose out of Respondent’s agent’s misrepresentations to Claimant that NewEdge Signal Solutions (“NewEdge”) secured a major contract with Dish Wireless Network and that Respondent was working on a registration statement to take NewEdge public to induce him to convert a $100,000 promissory note to NewEdge 56,750 shares of common stock and then make another $100,000 purchase 50,000 shares of NewEdge common stock because the company was about to go public. However, the representations that there was a contract with Dish Wireless Network and that Respondent was working with NewEdge to file a registration statement to take the company public at that point in time were false. The broker-dealer rescinded the transaction just before the final hearing in May 2022 and paid us $35,000 for attorney fees.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $210,000   This FINRA arbitration against a major broker-dealer in the United States and its off-shore subsidiary involved overconcentration of Puerto Rico municipal bonds and closed-end funds and unsuitable “hold” recommendations when the broker-dealer knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled in 2019 for $210,000 even though the broker-dealer claimed the clients’ accounts had tens of thousands of dollars in profits.
  • Florida State Court Settlement $205,000   This is an action based upon Defendants’ false and misleading statements to Plaintiffs in connection with their investment in a private placement transaction. The Defendants misrepresented themselves as experts and specialists in all aspects of “interim” and “bridge” financing and “factoring” transactions to be undertaken by the investment fund.  They not only misrepresented facts but expressed opinions about the “interim” and “bridge” loan and “factoring” program without any reasonable basis and upon which Plaintiffs justifiably relied due to the Defendants’ alleged expertise in violation of Section 517.301, Florida Statutes and common law for fraud, negligent misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract and conspiracy. Within six months, the Defendants settled for the full amount of the investment, $205,000.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $200,000   This FINRA arbitration was settled with an individual investor for $200,000 by a major Wall Street firm in 2010 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $200,000   This FINRA Arbitration involved a Florida investor who was disabled and claimed her broker-dealer over-concentrated and overleveraged her account in Puerto Rico municipal bonds and further made unsuitable recommendations to “hold” those positions when it knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled on the eve of the arbitration hearing in 2018 for $200,000.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $199,000   This FINRA arbitration was settled with an individual investor for $199,000 by a major Wall Street firm in 2012 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $195,000  This FINRA arbitration against a major broker-dealer in the United States and its off-shore subsidiary involved overconcentration of Puerto Rico municipal bonds and closed-end funds and unsuitable “hold” recommendations when the broker-dealer knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled in 2020 for $195,000 even though the broker-dealer claimed the clients’ accounts had tens of thousands of dollars in profits.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $195,000  This FINRA Arbitration involved a Puerto Rico investor who claimed her Puerto Rico broker-dealer over-concentrated her account in Puerto Rico municipal bonds and further made an unsuitable recommendation to “hold” those positions when it knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled in 2020.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $195,000  This FINRA arbitration against a major broker-dealer in Puerto Rico municipal bonds and closed-end funds in an overleveraged account and unsuitable “hold” recommendations when the broker-dealer knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled just days before the arbitration proceeding in March 2022.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $192,031   This FINRA arbitration was filed by a family and settled with one of the family members for $192,031 by a major Wall Street firm in 2013 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $192,031   This FINRA arbitration was filed by a family and settled with another of the family members for $192,031 by a major Wall Street firm in 2013 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $192,031   This FINRA arbitration was filed by a family and settled with the third family member for $192,031 by a major Wall Street firm in 2013 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis. 
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $190,000   This FINRA arbitration was settled with an individual investor for $190,000 by a major Wall Street firm in 2012 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis. 
  • FINRA Arbitration Award $188,000   Case No. 99-03728 Sidney Nickin v. Ryan Beck and Co., Inc.   This FINRA arbitration involved unsuitable investment recommendations and churning of a client whose was in the early stages of Alzheimer’s disease.  The Arbitration Panel awarded full compensatory damages of $135,000 and attorney fees to be determined by a court of competent jurisdiction.  The Claimant proceeded to court and received an award of attorney fees (33%) in the amount of $45,000.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $186,000   This FINRA arbitration was settled with an individual investor for $186,000 by a major Wall Street firm in 2012 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $185,000   This FINRA arbitration was filed by an 84 year old widow after she deposited her inheritance with a stockbroker in Central Florida proceeded to recommend a series of high commission Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) and a covered option writing strategy supposedly to generate income for the widow to live on.   The true motivation was to generate commissions.  The financial advisor excessively traded the widow’s account in not only options but technology stocks.  The broker-dealer settled this dispute for $185,000 which was all of the widow’s losses.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $183,602   This FINRA arbitration was settled with an individual investor for $183,602 by a major Wall Street firm in 2011 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis. 
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $181,611   This FINRA arbitration was settled with an individual investor for $181,611 by a major Wall Street firm in 2013 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis.
  • Pre-FINRA Arbitration Settlement $175,000   This dispute was between a charitable organization and a major broker-dealer whose financial advisor misrepresented facts, mismanaged its portfolio and even took undisclosed commissions while working on a fee basis.  The Wall Street firm quickly settled to avoid a scandal when it was advised of the financial abuse suffered by this charity in 2006 for $175,000.  
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $170,000   This FINRA arbitration against a major broker-dealer in the United States and its off-shore subsidiary involved overconcentration of Puerto Rico municipal bonds and closed-end funds and unsuitable “hold” recommendations when the broker-dealer knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled in 2015 for $170,000 even though the broker-dealer claimed the clients’ accounts had thousands of dollars in profits.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $175,000   This FINRA arbitration arose out of the underwriting for stock ratings scandal involving a major Wall Street firm’s brokerage and investment banking divisions during the 2000-2002 stock market crash. The firm settled in 2006 for $175,000.   
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $175,000   This FINRA arbitration was settled with an individual investor for $175,000 by a major Wall Street firm in 2011 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $175,000 This FINRA arbitration was settled with another individual investor for $175,000 by the same major Wall Street firm in 2011 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $175,000   This FINRA arbitration was filed by a parent whose daughter had died in a car accident and discovered the stockbroker she had hired engaged in mutual sales practice abuses, including, mutual fund switching, penny stock fraud, unsuitable investment recommendations and churning. The dispute was emotional and fortunately settled at mediation for $175,000.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $170,000   This FINRA arbitration was settled with an individual investor for $170,000 by a major Wall Street firm in 2009 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis. 
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $166,000  This was a case about the failure to liquidate and transfer assets in a timely manner, and misrepresentations and misleading statements relating thereto by a major broker-dealer’s employee to Claimant and his agents. It was settled just prior to the final hearing in November 2022.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $165,000   This FINRA arbitration was settled with an individual investor for $165,000 by a major Wall Street firm in 2010 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $162,500   This FINRA Arbitration involved Puerto Rico investors who claimed their Puerto Rico broker-dealer over-concentrated and overleveraged their accounts in Puerto Rico municipal bonds and further made unsuitable recommendations to “hold” those positions when it knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled on the eve of the arbitration hearing in 2016 for $162,500. 
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $160,000   This FINRA arbitration was filed by an investor against a major North Carolina bank with operations in Florida for its financial advisors unsuitable recommendations to invest in a option trading program which was mismanaged and because the investor losses.  The excessive activity was flagged by the broker-dealer, but the customers were never contacted.  The brokerage firm settled in 2003 for $160,000.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $156,933   This FINRA arbitration was settled with an individual investor for $156,933 by a major Wall Street firm in 2012 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $150,000   This FINRA arbitration was filed by a retired dentist against a major Wall Street firm after its financial advisor recommended portfolio managers whose strategies he knew or should have known would concentrate the retirees securities portfolio in equities, including, those of aggressive growth based companies whose market capitalizations were collapsing and for the most part not generating any dividends that would serve as income sources for Claimants’ retirement living expenses.  The asset allocation strategy and stock transactions were unsuitable for Claimants in light of investment objective mandated by their age, retirement status, and financial condition.  The brokerage firm recognized its financial advisors negligence, and in 2005 settled with this investor for $150,000 which was substantially all of the losses suffered.
  • Florida State Court Settlement $150,000   This lawsuit was filed by a physician against an unregistered investment adviser who recommended viatical settlement contract investments without doing proper due diligence in what turned out to be a Ponzi scheme.  The investment adviser ultimately settled after unsuccessfully attempting to appeal a lower court decision for the amount of the physicians losses, $150,000.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $150,000   This FINRA arbitration arose out of unsuitable recommendations to finance a residence with a loan from a brokerage firm secured by investments which crashed during the 2008-2009 financial crisis.  The arbitration claims were settled by the firm and 2011 for $150,000. 
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $150,000   This FINRA Arbitration involved Puerto Rico investors who claimed their Puerto Rico broker-dealer over-concentrated their accounts in Puerto Rico municipal bonds and further made an unsuitable recommendation to “hold” those positions when it knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled in 2015 for $150,000.  
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $148,906   This FINRA arbitration was settled with an individual investor for $148,906 by a major Wall Street firm in 2013 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis.
  • FINRA Arbitration Award $142,000   Case No. 91-00463 Fergus v. Drexel Burnham Lambert   This arbitration involved misrepresentations and unsuitable investments in connection with an option trading strategy in violation of the Florida securities statutes. The Arbitration Panel made a full award, including attorney fees, under the securities law statutes to this investor in the amount of $257,000.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $141,580   This FINRA arbitration was settled with an individual investor for $141,580 by a major Wall Street firm in 2012 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement  $141,580  This FINRA arbitration was settled with another individual investor for $148,580 by a major Wall Street firm in 2012 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $139,000   This FINRA arbitration was settled with an individual investor for $139,000 by a major Wall Street firm in 2011 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $137,302 This FINRA arbitration was settled with an individual investor for $137,302 by a major Wall Street firm in 2013 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $135,942   This FINRA arbitration was settled with an individual investor for $135,942 by a major Wall Street firm in 2012 for losses arising out of a complex leveraged municipal arbitrage structured product which was allegedly misrepresented and mismanaged during the 2008 municipal bond financial crisis. 
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $135,000  This FINRA Arbitration involved Puerto Rico investor who claimed its Puerto Rico broker-dealer over-concentrated its accounts in Puerto Rico municipal bonds and further made an unsuitable recommendation to “hold” those positions when it knew market conditions were perilous.  The case settled in 2020.
  • Florida State Court Order $135,000  Case No. 2021-019506-CA-01; Blanca Maria Gómez De Hernández v. Maria Clemencia BatchelorThis dispute related to ownership of an account and was settled for her full 20% interest in the subject account in May 2022.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $130,000   This FINRA arbitration was tried and settled midway during the arbitration proceeding. It involved unsuitable investment recommendations.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $75,000   This FINRA Arbitration involved a major independent brokerage firm and financial advisor who liquidated 100% of a well diversified portfolio of mutual funds in a 401(k) and reinvested the liquidation proceeds into two illiquid fixed income/equity indexed annuities, and two non-traded and illiquid real estate investment trust and a private placement involving GPB Capital Holdings.  The case settled prior to the arbitration hearing in the fall of 2021.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $50,000  This FINRA arbitration involved a   North Carolina resident who claimed his financial advisor who made unsuitable recommendations, misrepresented and fully failed to disclose the risk of three GPB Holdings’ private placements which constituted 100% of the assets in his account. The claims were settled before the final hearing scheduled in September 2022.
  • FINRA Arbitration Settlement $14,000  This arbitration was filed against two broker dealers for their employee’s failure to manage Claimants’ accounts in a reasonable manner. He deployed a highly speculative strategy involving speculative investments, which were inconsistent with Claimants instructions, needs, financial condition. The second broker-dealer who inherited the advisor and accounts settled the claims for the additional losses that occurred after transfer was made in September 2023.
Representative Clients:
  • Ramos v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc., 714 So.2d 1146 (Fla. App. 3 Dist.), 1998
  • First Union Discount Brokerage Services, Inc. v. Milos, 997 F.2d 835 (11th Cir.), 1993
  • Great American Mortg. Corp. v. TMA Government Securities, Ltd., 1988 WL 26375 (S.D. Fla.), 1988
  • American Television and Communications Corp. v. American Communications and Television, Inc., 810 F.2d 1546, 86 A.L.R. Fed. 479 (11th Cir. Fla.), 1987
  • S.E.C. v. Kwak, 2008 WL 410427 (D.Conn.), 2008
  • Allen v. TIC Participations Trust, 722 So.2d 260 (Fla. App. 4 Dist.), 1998
  • The Florida Bar re Advisory Opinion on Nonlawyer Representation in Securities Arbitration, 696 So.2d 1178 (22 Fla.L. Weekly S388), 1997
  • First Union Brokerage v. Milos, 717 F.Supp. 1519, Blue Sky L. Rep.P. 73,207, Fed.S (S.D.Fla.), 1989
  • Drexel Burnham Lambert, Inc. v. Warner, 665 F.Supp. 1549 (S.D. Fla.), 1987
  • S.E.C. v. Kwak and Wilson, 2008 WE 2705417 (D.Conn.), 2008
  • Allen v. Oakbrook Securities Corp., WL 1191450 (Fla. App. 4 Dist 1999), 1999
  • The Florida Bar re Advisory Opinion on Nonlawyer Representation in Securities Arbitration, 696 So.2d 1178 (22 Fla.L. Weekly S388), 1997
  • S.E.C. v. Sunco Resource and Energy, Ltd., Inc., WL 128232 (S.D. Fla.), 1990
  • In re Mullin, 91 B.R. 175 (Bankr. S.D. Fla.), 1988
  • S.E.C. v. Wilson, 2009 WL 2381954 (D.Conn.), 2009
  • Tashea v. Bache, Halsey, Stuart, Shields, Inc., 802 F.2d 1337, 55 USLW 2264 Fed. Sec. L Rep.P9 (11th Circ. Fla.), 1986
  • S.E.C. v. Competitive Technologies. Inc., 2006 WL 3346210 (D.Conn.), 2006
Special Licenses/Certifications:
  • Florida Certified Circuit Court (Civil) Mediator
Honors/Awards:
  • Florida Super Lawyer in Securities Litigation continuously since 2013, Super Lawyers-Securities Litigation, Thomson Reuters Superlawyers
  • Member, Million Dollar Advocates Forum
  • Martindale Hubbell AV Preeminent Peer Review Rated continuously since 1996, Martindale Hubbell AV Preeminent, Martindale Hubbell
  • Member, Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum recognizes attorneys who have received multiple multi-million dollar judgments, arbitration awards and settlements like Mr. Pearce has in his career, Multi-Million Dollar Advocate
Educational Background:
  • Florida Tech, B.S., 1973
  • Hofstra University School of Business, Hempstead, New York, M.B.A., 1979
White Papers:
Scholarly Lectures/Writings:
Firm News (Newsletters):
  • Mr. Pearce has written hundreds of blog articles covering the securities and commodities industry relating to his investigations and securities and commodities court, arbitration and administrative proceedings, The Investors Rights Blog, Securities And Commodities
Industry Groups:
  • Arbitration And Mediation
  • Commodities
  • Investment Litigation
  • Securities

Office location for Robert W. Pearce

1499 West Palmetto Park Road
Suite 400
Boca Raton, FL 33486

Phone: 888-752-8123

Selections

13 Years Super Lawyers
  • Super Lawyers: 2013 - 2025

Articles about Robert W. Pearce by Super Lawyers

No Excuses

Additional sources of information about Robert W. Pearce

Attorney resources for Robert W. Pearce

Page Generated: 0.15656709671021 sec