Skip to main content

Keeley Karatinos

Attorney Profile

Top Rated Criminal Defense Attorney in Dade City, FL

Karatinos Law, PLLC
37865 Robinson Ave., Ste. 1
Dade City, FL 33523
Phone: 9412431661
Selected to Rising Stars: 2020 - 2022
Licensed in Florida Since: 2015
Practice Areas: Criminal Defense, Criminal Defense: DUI/DWI, Appellate
Languages Spoken: English, Russian, Spanish
Attorney Profile

In 2014, Keeley Karatinos earned her Juris Doctor and graduated cum laude with a concentration in Advocacy. For the Law Student Division of the American Bar Association, Ms. Karatinos served as the White Collar Crime Committee’s National Liaison. She also has valuable experience in drafting orders and conducting legal research from her time as an intern.  Ms. Karatinos is admitted to practice in the states of Florida and West Virginia. She is a member of the Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Inc., the East Pasco Bar Association, Inc., The Florida Bar, the American Bar Association and The Florida Bar Diversity and Inclusion Committee. While in law school at Stetson University College of Law, she was given the Victor O. Wehle Trial Advocacy Award and the William F. Blews Pro Bono Award.

Keeley Karatinos opened Karatinos Law, PLLC. 

Karatinos Law is committed to defending the constitutional rights and liberties of the people. She focuses heavily on legal research, extensive trial preparation, and approaching each case with the understanding that her client is facing tremendous stress as the case continues through the criminal justice system. Ms. Karatinos commits herself to making herself available to answer her client's questions and explain each step the proceedings to remove the inherent fear of the unknown.

Along with general criminal law matters, Ms. Karatinos also represents clients in matters of post-conviction relief, appellate practice and driver’s license defense. She is fluent in English, Russian and Spanish and holds a strong belief that everyone deserves to be treated with compassion and dignity. With her knowledge of the law and culture, she is a formidable opponent and zealous when it comes to protecting her clients’ best interests, particularly when they are deprived of liberty, privileges or rights.

About Keeley Karatinos

First Admitted: 2015, Florida

Professional Webpage:

Bar/Professional Activity

  • DUI Defense Lawyers Association
  • National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers- Lifetime member
  • Florida Association of Women Lawyers
  • West Virginia
  • Florida Bar Diversity and Inclusion Committee (member 2018-2019).
  • National Liaison, American Bar Association, Law Student Division, White Collar Crime Committee
  • American Bar Association (member since 2012).
  • Florida Bar Association (member since 2015).
  • East Pasco Bar Association (member since 2016).
  • Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers- Lifetime member.


  • Fellow, Honorable Lynn Tepper in the Sixth Judicial Circuit, Dade City, Florida
  • For exemplary performance in Stetson's trial advocacy course., Victor O. Wehle Award, Stetson University, College of Law, 2014

Educational Background

  • The University of Florida, Bachelors in Russian Language and Political Science

Pro bono/Community Service

  • William F. Blews Pro Bono Service Award Recipient in 2014, for performing a minimum 150 hours of community service over a 3 year period., 2014

Special Licenses/Certifications

  • Florida Notary, 2019

Scholarly Lectures/Writings

  • Ms. Karatinos provided the Florida Bar's 2020 Masters of DUI attendees a hour lecture on Cross-Examining a Law Enforcement Officer., Lecturer, Masters of DUI, Florida Bar, 2021


  • DUI trial resulted in a Not Guilty Verdict, with jury deliberations lasting less than 15 minutes., 2021
  • Two counts of DUI Manslaughter with Blood Alcohol Content of my client was 0.298g/L. Jury found Defendant not guilty of DUI Manslaughter, but guilty of one count of simple DUI without enhanced blow penalties. This was a huge relief for my client who was facing up to 30 years in prison and a lifetime revocation of his driving privilege. , 2021
  • 7 minute not guilty verdict after client accused on driving under the influence. Dashcam video and audio available for the jury to see when the Trooper claimed my client was heavily intoxicated., 2021
  • After 4 years of pre-trial litigation, Ms. Karatinos' client who was charged with three (3) counts of Lewd and Lascivious Molestation of a minor less than 12 years of age, (each charge is punishable by a minimum mandatory penalty of 25 years in prison up to life in prison), given probation on vastly reduced charges, with no sexual offender registration requirements. , 2021
  • DUI with property damage charge dismissed by the prosecutor by the filing of a "Nolle Prosequi" the day before calendar call., 2021
  • My client was stopped by a deputy sheriff for a technical violation of the law. The deputy stopped my client so that he could run a dog sniff on his vehicle. During the search, the dog alerted to the presence of drugs. My client admitted to having methamphetamine and marijuana on his person, pulled out the drugs to show the deputy, and was then arrested. After reviewing the probable cause affidavit, I was aware of a change in the law which made the stop of my client's vehicle a violation of his 4th Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. After taking depositions of the law enforcement officer witnesses, I filed a motion to suppress, and before we could even hold the hearing, the State dropped the case by filing a Nolle Prosequi., 2020
  • My client was arrested for Burglary of an Occupied Dwelling with a Battery (a Punishable by Life felony). His bond was originally set at $100,000.00. After a bond reduction motion, I was able to get his bond reduced to $7,500.00 with an ankle bracelet. Once he was released from county jail, I then was able to present the actual facts of the case to the prosecutor who decided to dismiss the charges by filing a No Information. From start to finish, the case lasted less than 35 days., 2020
  • My client was accused of sexual battery of a teenage girl (with force) with whom he went to school. My client was facing a maximum of 15 years in prison, and scored a minimum of 8 years if convicted at trial.  At all times my client admitted that they shared a sexual encounter, but that it was consensual. After numerous depositions, pre-trial proceedings, and negotiations with the prosecutor, my client decided to accept the State's offer of a withhold of adjudication for a first-degree misdemeanor battery, rather than go to trial. Within 6 months, my client was finished with probation, is not a registered sex offender, and is now in the process of having his record expunged., 2020
  • My client was charged with DUI, after he ran over a body laying in the public roadway. To avoid the potential circumstance where the State file felony charges of DUI Homicide, a 2nd degree felony punishable by up to 15 years in prison with a minimum mandatory sentence of 4 years, I decided to bring his case to trial as soon as possible so that double jeopardy would attach. Shortly after I was hired, I hired and disclosed an expert to rebut the testimony of the arresting officer as it related to his administration of Field Sobriety Exercises (FSE). After the case was set for trial, the Court entered an Order directing all parties to submit any Motions in Limine prior to calendar call. The State ignored this Order and filed a Motion in Limine to exclude my FSE expert on the eve of trial. The Court denied the State's request to hear the Motion in Limine prior to voir dire, but stated that it would allow the State to make any objects during trial and even voir dire my expert outside of the presence of the jury. The State then requested a continuance of trial if the Court would not hear its motion prior to jury selection. The Court denied this motion. The State then threatened to announce a Nolle Prosequi and then refile the charges if the Court would not entertain the Motion in Limine, or in the alternative, grant the State a continuance. The Court denied both requests again. The State announced a Nolle Prosequi and refiled the DUI charge the following week. I then filed a Motion to Dismiss for violation of my client's Due Process rights, and showed the Court that the State's decision to nolle prosequi the DUI was made in bad faith because its only purpose was to circumvent the Court's Orders, and not for a legitimate purpose such as witness unavailability. The Court agreed, and dismissed the case with prejudice. As an aside, my client also hired me to defend his license from administrative suspension through the DMV. Ultimately, the DMV sustained the suspension, which I then Petitioned for Writ of Certiorari to the circuit court for review. The appellate attorney for the DMV agreed with me, and stipulated to the dismissal of the Petition in exchange for removing the suspension from my client's driver's license. My client walked away from the unfortunate situation with his full driving privileges intact, and the criminal case dismissed with prejudice by the Court. 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 535a, 2019
  • I sought review from the DHSMV's ruling, validating the suspension of my client's driver's license after being arrested for DUI. The DHSMV continued to violate driver's due process rights by taking testimony over the phone, without verifying the identity of the witness. I sought review with the Pasco Circuit Civil Appellate Division, which agreed in a Per Curium, three-judge panel, that the Department's policy violates driver's right to due process., 2020
  • Sought review of DHSMV suspension of my client's driver's license after an arrest for DUI. DHSMV instituted a practice of taking testimony over the telephone without first identifying the witness' identity. Hillsborough County Circuit Judge Holder found that the DHSMV was violating the driver's due process rights and removed the suspension from my client's driving record., 2020
  • My client was arrested for burglary after he entered his sister's home, without her knowledge or permission, and took his cats back. The sister claimed that he gave her the cats, while he maintained that he never gave her the cats but was forced to take them when she was not home because she refused to give them back to him. While the criminal case was pending, the sister filed a Petition for Injunction against Domestic Violence against the brother, with the sole issue being that entered the home and took the cats. My client hired me in both cases. I first went to Injunction hearing and argued to the Court that entering a home without permission is not a form of domestic violence, taking cats is not a form of domestic violence, and entering a home without permission in order to take cats is also not a form of domestic violence. The Court disagreed and entered the Injunction into the record for 5 years. I appealed the Court's decision with the 2nd DCA, who agreed that entering a home without permission to take cats is not a legal basis for a domestic violence injunction, and overturned the ruling. 247 So. 3d 666 (Fla. 2d DCA 2018) As for the criminal case, I was able to work out a time sharing deal with the siblings, and my client was able to walk away from the criminal charges without a record., 2017
  • My client was charged with his 8th DUI. Several of his DUIs took place in the 1960s, outside of the State of Florida, which did not count against his ability to acquire a Florida driver license. However, if he were convicted of the 8th DUI, his Florida Driver License would have been permanently revoked. My client hired me to represent him in the criminal charge as well as defend against the DMV's administrative suspension of his license. Luckily, I beat the administrative suspension of his license on a technicality, but I knew beating the criminal DUI case would not be so easy. I filed a Motion to Suppress in the criminal case, based on the arresting officer violating my client's 4th Amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches a seizure. In essence, the arresting officer stopped my client because he observed my client urinate in a parking lot. However, neither the Florida law does not prohibit public urination specifically, nor county or city ordinances. The Court agreed that the officer violated my client's 4th Amendment right and suppressed all evidence and statements in the case. The State filed a Nolle Prosequi after this ruling. 26 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 117c, 2018
  • My client was charged with DUI with property damage and Making a False Report to Law Enforcement. The sole issue in the case was whether my client or his girlfriend drove a truck into a ditch and rolled over. An independent witness drove up to the overturned truck and saw my client get of the truck and yell inside, "You wrecked my truck. You wrecked my f***ing truck!" An ambulance took the girlfriend to the hospital who later said that my client was driving the vehicle. My client hired me to defend him in the criminal case and in the DMV administrative suspension of his driver's license. At the administrative hearing, I called several witnesses to the hearing to show that the girlfriend was the one driving the truck, which included a friend of theirs that saw her leave the parking lot with my client in the passenger seat, and the independent witness which testified that my client yelled at his girlfriend that she wrecked his truck. Even with this testimony, the DMV decided to sustain the license suspension. I then filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari, and asked the Circuit Court to review the DMV's decision. The Circuit Court agreed with me that DMV's decision was not based on competent substantial evidence, and quashed the suspension of the driver license. Next, I presented the testimony of the witnesses at the DMV administrative hearing to the prosecutor in the criminal case, and convinced the State to abandon the criminal charges. My client walked away with his full driving privileges, the criminal charges abandoned, and all traffic citations dismissed. 27 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 217b, 2018
  • My client was charged with Battery on a Law Enforcement Officer (3F) and Resisting Arrest With Violence (3F). He also qualified as a Habitual Felony Offender, under Florida Statute section 775.084, which, if convicted of the felony, gives the Court discretion to sentence my client to 10 years in prison for a 3rd degree felony- which is punishable by only 5 years in prison. At trial, the jury found my client Not Guilty of Battery on a Law Enforcement Officer, and Guilty of the lesser included charge of Resisting Arrest Without Violence- a 1st degree misdemeanor punishable by up to 1 year in the county jail. My client was grateful to avoid the hefty prison sentence., 2016
  • My client was arrested for DUI (3rd), DUI with personal injury, and Leaving the Scene of an Accident without Rendering Aid. My client hired me to defend him in the criminal case and defend his license from being suspended by the DMV.  In the administrative hearing relating to the suspension of his driver's license, I was able to get the arresting officer to admit that he did not have probable cause to arrest my client because no physical evidence connected my client or his vehicle to the accident, and the alleged witness to the accident did not actually see the accident, but came upon the injured cyclist minutes after the collision. The DMV agreed that the arrest was without probable cause and invalidated the suspension. I then presented the case and the full set of facts to the State of Florida before they filed official charges, and persuaded them to abandon the case against my client in its entirety. At the end of the day, my client walked away from the situation without a driver suspension, with the criminal charges dropped, and all traffic citations dismissed., 2017
  • My client was charged with Battery, a first-degree misdemeanor, punishable by up to 1 year in the county jail. Since he had no prior criminal history, the State of Florida offered him the ability to complete a pre-trial intervention (PTI) program. PTI is offered to first time offenders, where they enter an agreement with the State to complete a list of conditions, and upon completion, the State dismisses the charge. However, in this case, the State wanted my client to pay over $30,000.00 in restitution to the alleged victim for hospital bills relating to a broken orbital bone. My client chose to go to trial instead to allow a jury of his peers to determine his culpability after hearing all of the facts surrounding the fight. At the end of the day, the jury returned a verdict of Not Guilty, in essence deciding that in the situation he was permitted to use self-defense, and that he was not criminally culpable., 2018
  • My client was charged with Sexual Battery, a second-degree felony, punishable by up to 15 years in prison. At trial, I focused on the credibility of the accusor, the motivation she had to lie, and the dearth of evidence in support of her allegations. After a 3 day trial, the jury returned a verdict of Not Guilty., 2018
Show More
Office Location for Keeley Karatinos

37865 Robinson Ave.
Ste. 1
Dade City, FL 33523

Last Updated: 5/15/2022

Page Generated: 0.66693305969238 sec