Practice Areas: Family Law, Entertainment & Sports; view more
Licensed in Florida since: 2018
Education: Barry University Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law
Call today:
386-868-0215
Ross & Andreassi, PLLC
500 N Oleander AveDaytona Beach, FL 32118 Visit website
Details
Dillon M. Andreassi has been representing those in need of competent and tenacious family law attorney for half a decade. A partner with Ross & Andreassi, PLLC, in Daytona Beach, Florida, he assists his clients with complex family law litigation involving contested and uncontested divorces, alimony, child support, domestic violence, prenuptial and postnuptial agreements and property division. Also, he takes on cases related to entertainment and sports law.
Mr. Andreassi received his undergraduate degree in political science and government from the University of South Florida and joined the Barry University Dwayne O. Andreas School of Law. In 2018, he secured his J.D. and was licensed to practice in Florida.
A compassionate professional, Mr. Andreassi knows how painful divorce is for the involved parties. A strong proponent of alternative dispute resolution methods, he firmly believes in the long-lasting nature of resolutions made through collaborative law processes. He passionately advocates for each client, helping them confidently adapt to the next chapter of their life and upholds the highest standards of professionalism.
Under the close mentorship and guidance of a board-certified family law attorney, Mr. Andreassi has gained invaluable experience and honed his trial advocacy skills in family law. He has also obtained significant verdicts and results for his clients.
Owing to his excellence in his field of practice, Mr. Andreassi has been selected to the lists of Attorney and Practice Magazine’s “Top 10 Family Law Attorneys” and “Top 10 Family Law Attorneys Under 40” for several years in a row. Moreover, he has memberships in The Florida Bar’s Family Law Section and the Volusia County Bar Association (Family Law Section).
Practice areas
Family Law, Entertainment & SportsFocus areas
Adoption, Alimony & Spousal Support, Child Support, Custody & Visitation, Dissolution, Divorce, Domestic Violence, Entertainment, Sports & Leisure Law, Father's Rights, Marital Property, Mediation & Collaborative Law, Name Change, Paternity, Prenuptial Agreements, Same Sex Family Law
- 90% Family Law
- 10% Entertainment & Sports
First Admitted: 2018, Florida
Professional Webpage: http://fldivorcesite.com/dillon-andreassi
- Member of the Family Law Section of the Florida Bar., 2023
- Member of the Volusia County Bar Association, 2023
- Member of the Family Law Section of the Florida Bar., 2022
- Member of the Volusia County Bar Association, 2022
- Member of the Family Law Section of the Florida Bar., 2021
- Member of the Volusia County Bar Association, 2021
- Dills v. Perez, 330 So.3d 989 (Fla. 5th DCA 2021): Prepared and filed initial brief and reply brief with the Fifth District Court of Appeal regarding the issues of durational alimony. The parties had entered into a marital settlement agreement which made the durational alimony non-modifiable. This case was a case of first impression. The case was first heard by the general magistrate who recommended termination of alimony. Following the report and recommendations issued by the general magistrate we filed exceptions and had a hearing with the circuit court judge. The circuit court judge agreed with the general magistrates' recommendations and entered an order terminating alimony. On appeal the Fifth District Court of Appeal agreed with our arguments and reversed the trial court's ruling to terminate alimony, stating, "We have not previously ruled on this issue, but our sister district courts have done so in the context of non-modifiable bridge-the-gap alimony and permanent alimony. See Taylor v. Lutz, 134 So. 3d 1146 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) (bridge-the-gap alimony); Herbst v. Herbst, 153 So. 3d 290 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (permanent alimony). In both situations, the courts found that the express inclusion of “non-modifiable” in the parties' MSAs prohibited the termination of alimony upon remarriage. Taylor, 134 So. 3d at 1148–49; Herbst, 153 So. 3d at 293. We agree with those results, and to the extent that the nature of the alimony award is relevant, find the reasoning of Taylor and Herbst applies equally to bridge-the-gap, permanent, and durational alimony awards in MSAs." Dills v. Perez, 330 So.3d 989, 990 (Fla. 5th DCA 2021). The Fifth District Court of Appeal further agreed that, "Therefore, because the clear and unambiguous language of the parties' MSA controls over the statute, we “must treat the written instrument as evidence of the agreement's meaning and the parties' intention.” Taylor, 134 So. 3d at 1148 (citations omitted). “To do otherwise would most certainly vault form over substance.” Id. (citing Underwood v. Underwood, 64 So. 2d 281, 288 (Fla. 1953)). Accordingly, we hold that Former Husband's obligation to pay Former Wife durational alimony for 48 months did not terminate upon Former Wife's remarriage and, as a result, the trial court erred by failing to order enforcement of the MSA's alimony provision." Dills v. Perez, 330 So.3d 989, 991 (Fla. 5th DCA 2021). 330 So.3d 989 Dills v. Perez, 330 So. 3d 989 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021), reh'g denied (Dec. 9, 2021), 2021
- Recipient, 2020 - 2023, Top 10 Family Law Attorney, Attorney & Practice Magazine
- Super Lawyers Rising Stars, Super Lawyers, 2023
- Recipient, 2022 - 2023, Top 10 Family Law Attorney Under 40, Attorney & Practice Magazine
- University of South Florida, Bachelors in Political Science., 2014
Office location for Dillon M. Andreassi
500 N Oleander Ave
Daytona Beach, FL 32118
Phone: 386-868-0215
Selections
- Rising Stars: 2023 - 2024