Ronald S. Bowling

At Fieger, Fieger, Kenney & Harrington, PC, Ronald S. Bowling is a personal injury attorney who represents clients in Michigan. His practice focus is on medical malpractice, but he also serves as a mediator in alternative dispute resolution. He has decades of experience managing cases of birth injuries, and for his high ethical standards and long list of successful results, he holds the highest peer rating possible of AV Preeminent* from Martindale-Hubbell.

In 1984, Mr. Bowling graduated with an undergraduate degree from DePauw University before pursuing his dream of becoming an attorney. He then graduated cum laude from the Indiana University Maurer School of Law with his Juris Doctor in 1987. Admitted to practice in the state of Michigan, he is also admitted to practice before the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan and the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.

During his career, Mr. Bowling obtained $1.5 million in a jury verdict for a delayed birth that led to injury, a $750,000 jury verdict for nursing negligence and a $300,000 jury verdict of negligence that resulted from a woman’ s death after surgery. His focus is on obtaining compensation for those who have been injured at the hands of another. He also has obtained several seven-figure settlements and recently secured an eight-figure settlement in a case involving a brain-injured minor. 

Throughout Michigan, Mr. Bowling serves those in the following counties: Wayne, Oakland, Macomb, Washtenaw, Genesee, Jackson, Lenawee, and Saginaw. Known for his integrity and zealous representation of his clients, he is always sensitive to the emotional and mental challenges families and individuals face as they deal with personal injuries.

* AV®, AV Preeminent®, Martindale-Hubbell Distinguished and Martindale-Hubbell Notable are certification marks used under license in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies. Martindale-Hubbell® is the facilitator of a peer review rating process. Ratings reflect the anonymous opinions of members of the bar and the judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Rating™ fall into two categories – legal ability and general ethical standards.