Stephen D. Beam

Stephen D. Beam Attorney at Law represents people who live in the western part of Oklahoma. He focuses his practice on business litigation, purchase and sale transactions and family law. Mr. Beam’s cases cover the following matters: oil and gas titles, federal and state regulatory matters, farm-outs, financing agreements, oil and gas contracts/licenses, land exchanges, operating issues, assignments and deeds, product liability, construction litigation, property damage, torts, personal injury claims, mergers and acquisitions, insurance claims and product defects. In matters concerning oil and gas, Mr. Beam accepts cases throughout the entire state.

After graduating from an undergraduate program, Mr. Beam went to the University of Oklahoma College of Law, earning a Juris Doctor. For more than 30 years, Mr. Beam has been representing the rights of others. He is admitted to the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, the United States Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit and the United States Supreme Court. His adherence to legal ethics and professionalism has earned him the highest rating possible of AV-Preeminent* from Martindale Hubbell.

Involvement in local and legal communities is important to Mr. Beam, and over the years he has been a member of several organizations. These organizations include the Custer County Bar Association, the Oklahoma Bar Association, the Oklahoma Association for Justice and the Oklahoma Criminal Defense Lawyers Association. Mr. Beam has served these organizations in a number of ways, holding positions as president, committee chair, treasurer, board member and even division director. In 2003, he was honored as solo lawyer of the year by Phi Delta Phi.

^{* AV-Preeminent and BV-Distinguished are certification marks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies. Martindale-Hubbell is the facilitator of a peer review rating process. Ratings reflect the confidential opinions of members of the Bar and the judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell ratings fall into two categories – legal ability and general ethical standards.}