Natalie Finkelman Bennett

A vehement advocate for her clients, Natalie Finkelman Bennett has spent over 35 years cementing a solid reputation as a judicious attorney who fights tooth and nail to provide her clients with the relief they deserve in their contentious legal matters. A partner at Miller Shah LLP in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, she is well-equipped to take on complex cases pertaining to antitrust law, commercial litigation, consumer protection, class actions, insurance law and civil rights, as well as wage and hour disputes, and unfair trade practices, among many others.

Ms. Bennett completed her undergraduate studies in 1986, graduating with her Bachelor of Arts degree magna cum laude in foreign service and international relations from The Pennsylvania State University. She went on to attend the Temple University Beasley School of Law, honing her shrewd legal acumen and talents with the foresight of helping her clients in the future. She received her Juris Doctor with high honors in 1989, and in the same year, she obtained her license to practice law in Pennsylvania and New Jersey. Later on, she gained admission to practice before the following federal courts:

• The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

• The United States District Court for the District of New Jersey

• The United States Courts of Appeals for the 1st, 3rd and 9th Circuits

A consummate professional through and through, Ms. Bennett strives to take the brunt of her clients’ legal troubles onto her shoulders so that they can focus on themselves and their loved ones during this difficult time. For her many contributions, she has been peer-review rated AV Preeminent* through Martindale-Hubbell, the organization’s highest rating.

*AV®, AV Preeminent®, Martindale-Hubbell Distinguished and Martindale-Hubbell Notable are certification marks used under license in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies. Martindale-Hubbell® is the facilitator of a peer-review rating process. Ratings reflect the anonymous opinions of members of the bar and the judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell® Peer Review Ratings™ fall into two categories – legal ability and general ethical standards.