Top Rated Alternative Dispute Resolution Attorney in Seattle, WA

As a general business lawyer at A. Kyle Johnson Arbitration & Mediation, Mr. Johnson provides dedicated legal representation to clients in Seattle, Washington. He focuses his practice on matters involving business, real estate, tax, large asset marital dissolution and alternative dispute resolution issues.

Prior to earning a Juris Doctor from the University of Washington School of Law in 1966, Mr. Johnson attended Lewis & Clark. From there, he received a Bachelor of Arts in 1963. He furthered his legal education with a Master of Laws in taxation from The George Washington University in 1971.

Mr. Johnson began his career as a lawyer in the United States Army, where he served in Korea and tried court-martial cases. He then went on to serve in the Pentagon for a period, as well as with several other law firms, gaining valuable experience in a broad range of business and civil litigation matters.

With more than 40 years of experience, Mr. Johnson draws on his knowledge to help develop effective and creative strategies to resolve his clients' legal disputes. His dedication to high standards of legal ethics has helped Mr. Johnson to achieve the highest possible rating of AV Preeminent* from Martindale-Hubbell. He also has an Avvo "Superb" rating.

Beyond his work in the courtroom, Mr. Johnson is an active member of the legal community. His professional memberships include the American Bar Association, the King County Bar Association and the Washington State Bar Association. Mr. Johnson has shared his legal knowledge by teaching courses and lecturing on topics relating to his areas of focus, including serving as a continuing legal education speaker and panelist for real estate and family law.

*AV Preeminent and BV Distinguished are certification marks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used in accordance with the Martindale-Hubbell certification procedures, standards and policies. Martindale-Hubbell is the facilitator of a peer review rating process. Ratings reflect the confidential opinions of members of the bar and the judiciary. Martindale-Hubbell ratings fall into two categories: legal ability and general ethical standards.